Search

28 Mar 2009: But under his premiership, sig interventions in the field of economics and official advice. ... May 1931, Macmillan Report published. June 1931, Kahn’s article published in the Economic Journal.

3 Jan 2012: observation: not all economic phenomena can readily be explained using this framework – most recently bubbles/crises; but also the specific property of capitalism, that it grows. ... it is difficult to distinguish between “behavioral theories built

8 Mar 2012: Shortage approach: managerial decisions at micro-level. ‘There are few tenets of the economics of centrally planned economies which are more likely to cause disagreement than the notion that centrally planned

16 Feb 2011: or imaginary, in which case they will have no economic significance.’.

28 Oct 2010: How will the Financial Crisis change Macro-Economics? By C.A.E. Goodhart. Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics. ... 14) Complete disconnect between macro-economics (no default) and Finance, where PoD determines asset pricing.

23 Jul 2012: change variables, like the wage level, kept ‘in the pound’ in the short period, the economic system necessarily tends in historical time towards an optimal long-period equilibrium, by means of ... as an application of the ceteris paribus method, as a

31 Mar 2014: D-C 0.14166667 -0.03107198 0.31440532 0.1416151 #insignific. More tests. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test – non-parametric test for median. ... Grubbs test – tests for outliers (more in R package – outliers).

19 Mar 2011: T]he mathematization of economics … formalized the system as a series of markets each described by a demand function and a supply function. ... Concluding Remarks. On the Impossibility of Involuntary Unemployment Equilibrium in Mainstream Economic

20 Dec 2008: This did not prevent Keynes from issuing trenchant judgements on Marx’s economics. ... Conclusion. Marx’s economic theory was a significant advance from classical political economy.

30 Nov 2008: Since Keynesian economics is derived, by definition, from the work of John Maynard Keynes, one might suppose that reading Keynes is an important part of Keynesian theorizing. ... In fact, quite the opposite is the case.” [European Economic Review, 1992]