Search

23 Feb 2006: to reproducethe conditions that may exist at the beginning of a test. ... 5.1.1. Initial imperfections. Many different combinations of eigenmodes and scal-ing factors were considered to test the sensitivity of the results of the detailedwrinkling analysis

12 Jan 2006: 2 METHODOLOGY. 2.1 Ground conditions. This series of pile load tests was conducted during summer 2003 at the Takasu test site located in Kochi, Japan. ... Figure 2. Ground conditions at test site. Figure 3. Arrangement of test piles.

18 Jan 2006: 2.5 Test programme. A series of four tests was conducted, using two grain sizes and two densities as shown in Table 1. ... Table 1. Summary of tests Dry Voids Relative Test D50 density, ratio, density, φpeak ψpeak (mm) ρd (kg/m3) e ID CD 2.24 1687

18 Jan 2006: The solution to this drawback is to truncate only the test paf esm,nd. ... White et al.2003! report a precision better th0.05 pixels for test patches larger than 163 16 pixels in a varietof validation tests using GeoPIV.

12 Oct 2006: Vaterland 1, Oslo. Vaterland 1 is one of several test sections on the Oslo SubwaySystem. ... The writers show thatthe undrained DSS test gives good displacement predictions.Since triaxial tests are more commonly available in practice, fur-ther

15 Aug 2006: Also the stress path, i.e., therelationship between the different components of the effectivestress, is an interesting result of an undrained test, whereas it isusually imposed in dry tests. ... The result of an undrained test can, in principle, be

18 Jan 2006: 4) FE simulation of an undrained triaxial test was used toplot the representative stress–strain curve. ... deformation zones.(3) Determine the active and passive strengths mobilized. from compression and extension triaxial tests, respec-tively.

15 Aug 2006: will. Fig. 3. Comparison between pipe displacement and liquefaction frontadvance in Test TM01. ... standard soil tests. It is therefore assumed that the liquefied soil is.