Search

17 Jan 2022: So, in conclusion, this is about economics where the proponents hide the facts and the arguments can be highly speculative (“if you do/not do X, then Y would/not happen”). ... Again, digital librarians MUST use versioning. SF allows me to do

17 Jan 2022: Where: Clement House (D602), London School of Economics, London, UK (Programme: programme page. ... The resource will, of course, be Open from the start. Although the primary goal is to develop and test the ORE technology and design we hope that it will

17 Jan 2022: position. I thought them up in a train journey – not sure whether they will stand the test of time and I might comment later.

17 Jan 2022: PMR: I intend to be there (haven’t yet  checked diary). One of the values of blogging is that JudithMR knows what part of the world I am or will be ... The primary purpose of CrystalEye was to allow Nick to test the validity of QM calculations in

17 Jan 2022: 0.95 PLAT220_ALERT_2_C Large Non-Solvent C Ueq(max)/Ueq(min). 3.44 Ratio PLAT230_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff for O1A - C15A. ... S: “I saw you using Eclipse. I’m a software developer for [a company that tests devices] and we use it a lot”.

17 Jan 2022: School). Research for our new data blog, coming soon. Collaborations with our Working Groups, for example the Working Group on Open Economics. ... Because of the risk-averseness of libraries and the pressure from some publishers to limit activities such

17 Jan 2022: The new framework for research assessment and funding will ensure that excellent research of all types is rewarded, including that most likely to have an economic and social impact.”.

17 Jan 2022: JUMBO: PMR chemical software. Felix Q Potuit (London School of Economics) [the LSE beaver is on Felix’s T-Shirt]. ... Please suggest suitable names and a backstory for Monkey. Why is Monkey holding a test-tube and a pencil?

17 Jan 2022: If the errors are significant then it may not be a very useful test between methods. ... This is a painfully slow (but necessary) way of building up a test data set.

17 Jan 2022: Moedas continues:. In my view, there is a strong economic, scientific and moral case for embracing open science. ... I agree these are the fundamentals. The economic case is very strong, but it is very badly presented by Open Access enthusiasts.