Search

2 Mar 2000: IfX F8,5, then P(X 4.82) = 0.95. The tables can be used to conduct various hypothesis tests with sizes 0.01, 0.05and 0.10. ... For the F-distribution, only the 95% point is shown; this is what is neededto conduct a one-sided test of size 0.05.

4 Dec 2000: As a by-product this generates a test of SCT geometry within AGDD/XML and G4Builder framework.

31 Jul 2000: Pronunciation modeling by sharing Gaussians 141. TABLE I. WER degradation with speaking style on theMULTI-REG test set. ... Steps (6), (3), (4) and (5) arethen carried out in that order to estimate and test a matched pronunciation model.

10 May 2000: The TREC-8 SDR test collection[1] usedfor the experiments consists of 21,754 spoken documentsand 49 written queries. ... expansion. Thisparallel collection was larger and thought to be more re-liable than the automatically transcribed test collection.

5 Oct 2000: While MMIE is very effective at reducing training set error a keyissue is generalisation to test data. ... On other test setsimprovements greater than 1% absolute have also been obtained and.

17 Oct 2000: standard clean modelset and then to perform further adaptation for the actual test data [7]. ... For the evaluation test H3-P0 data one microphone was selectedby NIST for each speaker.

8 Mar 2000: approach, and two sets of HMMs were adapted.The test data for F2 was also automatically labelled as narrow. ... 1995 Hub-4 “Dry-Run” Broadcast Materials Bench-mark Tests. Proc. DARPA Speech Recognition Workshop, Har-riman, New York.

31 Jul 2000: nemea. Training data Average log2-prob (eciency). ICSI-test TIMIT-test. TIMIT 0.76! 0.60. ... derivation of the training transcrip-tions, and the hand-labelling of the test set.

5 Oct 2000: 4 IMPROVING MMIE GENERALISATION. An important issue in MMIE training is the ability to generalise tounseen test data. ... The results of these experiments on both theeval97sub and eval98 test sets are shown in Table 4.

8 Mar 2000: In tests the fastercache led to 6-8% faster decoder operation on a Xeon than onthe equivalent Pentium II. ... Further tests under different operating systems indicated that. compiler efficiency was also an important issue.