Search

25 May 2004: κ is a scalingfactor and can be adjusted to improve test-set performance. ... Table 3. Comparison of WER for MPE trained HLDA and EM-LLT models on thedev01sub test set.

13 May 2004: of shows inthe test set.

14 May 2004: He spent some years commuting to Harwell before returning in 1959 as aSenior Research Officer in the Institute of Economics and Statistics.

18 Jun 2004: During training and test adaptation, aglobal interpolation weight was estimated and separate speech andsilence transforms were used for CMLLR. ... Using ST for test adaptation again yieldedabout the same as a GD system with CMLLR.

9 Mar 2004: difference solution, so thepractical gain is marginal, except for accuracy tests.

27 May 2004: GI unadapted single pass decoding system. Table 2 gives WER on the test sets using the5xRT P1-P2system. ... thedev03 and eval03 test sets respectively.These results were even slightly better than the full 10xRT CU-.

9 Mar 2004: Some test cases were also run with a direct solver for theblock tri-diagonal system. ... other runs with small C, as an additional test of the predictivepower of the numerical code and the SW approximation.

26 Apr 2004: AD, as indicated by a significant t test on information type for thisgroup, t(14) 4.31, MSE 0.065, p. ... a significant t test on informationtype for this group, t(20) 6.61, MSE 0.032, p.

11 Oct 2004: Several numerical tests are presented in Section 4. One of these testsinvolves the Shepp–Logan phantom [26], see Figure 3(c). ... This reduces considerably the reconstruction time. 14. (a) (b) (c). Figure 6: Test phantoms for the SPECT algorithm.

3 Dec 2004: test-ed by sedimentation assays using liposomesor lipid tubules (19, 27, 28). ... Each assay contained0.05 mg/ml protein. (B) Liposomes containing 10%cholesterol, 40% phosphatidylethanolamine, 40%phosphatidylcholine, and 10% of a test lipid wereprepared