Search

10 Jan 2005: NIST,. Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT),.

20 Feb 2018: Two tailed z-tests at the 95% confidence levelwere used to test the statistical significance of the differencebetween the success rates. ... The use of the AMT workers is substantially more efficientwhen compared to a controlled test.

22 Jun 2007: Table 3 shows the P1-P2 perfor-mance3 of these baseline models on the BC and BN tests sets. ... Table 6. Unadapted %CER onbcmdev05. The models were then evaluated on the BC test set,bcmdev05.

20 Feb 2018: test set. Although this biased the NOV93 results, later analysis showed that the. ... DEC94 test sets. The resulting noisy speech utterances had signal-to-noise ratios.

13 Jun 2013: As the test data was Levantine Arabic,there is little appropriate data for training language models. ... Forthis work all the clean Levantine Arabic transcriptions, exclud-ing the dev1 test data, was used.

16 Jun 2008: During recognition the following procedure is used:1. Compensate the acoustic models for the test noise con-. ... dition2. Recognise the test utterance Y to obtain 1-best hypoth-. esis, h = h1,. ,

15 Aug 2007: Thispaper shows that multistyle models benefit from VTS compensationor Joint uncertainty decoding by reducing the mismatch betweentraining and test. ... Figures are reported against thedev03 test set encompassing3 hours of shows from six different news

19 Jun 2023: Feedback 140. Speech Processing. 21. Free speaking prompt-response tests – speak for up to 1 minute. ... INTERSPEECH 2020. • S. McKnight et al, “Automatic Assessment of Conversational Speaking Tests”, UK Speech C.

20 Feb 2018: natural example from each wave file pair. Altogether 16 listeners, 8native and 8 non-native, participated in the listening test. ... The resultis shown in Fig. 4. Statistical significance tests were performed assuming a bino-mial distribution of each

20 Feb 2018: He & Youngdetail the test data extraction process in [3]. Since the ATIS databaseis relatively large, all categories are treated as non-enumerable.1. ... over results reportedby He & Young using the HVS model on the same test set [4], but1.4% lower

20 Feb 2018: The training data had 276K words in 23K sentences while both the developmental set and the test set consisted of 10K words in 1K sentences. ... All sentences that contained out-of-vocabulary words were removed from the test set.

20 Feb 2018: The aim of the experiment was to test the robustness and performance of a spoken dialogue system in a moving car. ... The resulting speech database was further split into a training set (60%) and a test set (40%).

30 Sep 2019: NICT-JLE: oral proficiency test interviews. • CLC: range of written exams at different grade levels. ... 10. Boosting GED Performance on Spoken BULATS. 11. • Fine-tune CLC system with 80% data, dev 10%, test 10% x10. •

27 Sep 2000: VTLN warping in training and test both for GI and GDmodels for full and reduced bandwidth coding. ... 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We would like to thank BBN for providing the MiniTrain trainingand MTtest test set definitions.

20 Feb 2018: It is also important that theparticipants do not interact before the test is started. ... The con-fusion matrix can be trained on phone-labelled test output datafrom an ASR system.

19 Nov 2010: The two forms of modified tail distribution modelling were inves-tigated on the 1998 Hub4 partitioned evaluation test set. ... The test was performed on a subset of the 1997 par-titioned evaluation that was used for development [4].

21 Sep 2006: A detailed report of this test can be found in ourprevious work [10]. ... 20.2 fps).Figure 3 illustrates the recognition process on a typical test-ing clip.

21 Feb 2022: Automate (English) spoken language assessment & learning• without simplifying/limiting form of test: “free speaking”• possibility for richer, interactive, tests• desire to assess communication skills. ... 4/45. Spoken Language Assessment &

8 Sep 2010: Test set A was used as the development set for tuningparameters for all systems, such as the penalty factor Cfor SVMs. ... The integratedtraining yielded a 9% reduction in error rate. The full results for all three test sets are shown in TableII.

12 Apr 2005: For MLLR mean adaptation, a. SystemAdapt Test Set WER (%)Config eval03 dev04 dev04f. ... This system wasevaluated on botheval03 and dev04 test sets and comparedwith the SATDIAGC system.