Search

22 Jan 2024: 2013). Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests.

22 Feb 2012: Morgan was subsequentlyinvited to prove hersupernatural powers in aHalloween test devised bypsychologist Professor ChrisFrench, Head of theAnomalistic Psychology Research Unit atGoldsmiths, University of London. ... Spiers on theneurobiology of memory;

12 Jan 2001: Thus SD patients might, accord-ing to our model, be disproportion-ately impaired on tests of semantic ver-sus recognition memory even if thestimulus material were the same. ... When itemsare familiar, recognition tests might besolved by episodic

12 Jan 2024: rehearsal before finally beginning the test phase, during which they had to precisely. ... virtual environment and the location indicated by a participant during the test phase.

22 Feb 2008: Tests Parietal patients Controls. L1 L2 L3 R1 R2 R3 M S.D. ... 4). Using non-parametricann–Whitney tests, the patients with parietal lobe lesions were.

6 Feb 2001: dial telephone seen atstudy was replaced by a black touch button telephone at test). ... Recognition Memory Test (RMT), even though shewas within the normal range on other recognition memory tests (Evans,.

24 Jul 2008: But a UCL study, using this test, found that in a fifthof cases volunteers either thought they had imaginedwords that they had actually been shown or said theyhad seen words that ... My tendency is to give the excitingidea the benefit of the doubt and

3 Apr 2018: The order of test block (semantic and nonseman-tic) was counterbalanced across participants. ... Statistical Analysis. Across-trial permutation tests were conducted to test forsignificant effects in alpha power related to the semanticversus nonsemantic

22 Oct 2014: words, while the other half were added in the test phase as ‘‘new’’. ... Future studies could. test the effect of parietal disruption on memory tests that are more.

29 May 2019: After classifying the trials according totheir responses, we analyzed the behavioral data from study and test. ... 46, p 0.0001) and test ( 2(1) 65.28, p 0.0001).

19 Feb 2013: This approach allows comparison with test batteries used in humans (such as CANTAB). ... Although these tests putatively assess the same psychological capacity, they are, at least superficially, very different.

25 Oct 2021: tests typically lead to the largest amount of test-induced learning, recognition memory tests. ... settings, multiple choice tests that involve selecting between a correct answer and other.

13 May 2021: al test scores by APOE genotype group. e3e3(n 5 26)Mean (SD). ... Prior work has demonstrated an interaction between. study-test delay and the e4-allele on short-term memoryversions of continuous object-location tests with e4-car-riers at an advantage at

25 Jul 2002: studies assessed semantic knowledge about test. items using picture naming, word-to-picture. ... The same 49 items were used as targets in both. tests, selected fromthePyramidandPalmtrees test.

15 Mar 2022: In each test phase trial, a studied object was presentedat a random location around an invisible circle. ... Experiment 2: Imagined/Perceived Reality Monitoring. Participants were asked to complete a practice taskfollowed by 10 study–test cycles.

19 Feb 2019: of consolidation) would result in more ‘old schema mean responses’ during the Final Test. ... relevant schema in the Final Test for trials of the consistent category (B).

2 Jun 2005: Table 1Performance of Patients With Semantic Dementia and Control Participants on a Range ofNeuropsychological Tests. ... We note that although the tests for main effectswere not significant, numerical differences did exist.

29 Oct 2002: Pyramid and Palmtrees test (Howard and Patterson, 1992). The patients showed less of an impairment on standard tests. ... battery of standard frontal lobe tests. These included the. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Nelson, 1976), the Tower of.

30 Aug 2016: motivating theconcept that while both are tests of episodicmemory, they may be assessing different aspects ofthis ability. ... They were then given the “where” and “what” recognition tests, followed by the “when” orderdiscrimination test.

12 Jan 2001: 2.1.4. ProcedureThe experimental design consisted of two tests. In. the initial semantic test, the participants were asked toname 40 coloured pictures of familiar objects and ani-mals (see Fig. ... 4b) between per-formance on the PD items and other tests