Search

13 Feb 2023: test conditional: p(f|u) = N (K,uK1. u,uu, K, Q,) , (10b). ... Lower graph: assumption of conditional independencebetween training and test function values given u.

27 Jan 2023: IHMM evaluation in (Beal et al.,2002) is more elaborate: it allows the IHMM to con-tinue learning about new data encountered during test-ing. ... Subjecting theseresults to the same analysis as the artificial data re-veals similar compared test-set

13 Feb 2023: Table 1: Running times in seconds and test log-likelihoods for the Yale Faces dataset. ... Algorithm K Time Test Log-Likelihood. 2 56 -0.7444Finite Gibbs 5 120 -0.4220.

13 Feb 2023: We foundthat kst outperformed both competing methods sig-nificantly (p < 0.01, two sample T-test). ... 3. As measureof performance, we used average confusion, i. e. thefraction of misclassified test images.

13 Feb 2023: 3)–(5). Doing this properlyrequires mapping uncertain test inputs through theGP dynamics model. ... b) Histogram (after 1,000 test runs)of the distances of the flywheel frombeing upright.

27 Jan 2023: Can be applied to distributions where tests of conditional independence are known, but scores aren’t. ... 2) X1 - X2 into X2. Test. Test Conditions. X3. X2.

13 Feb 2023: Secondly, our empirical results (see Section 3)indicate, that the test set performance is simply not good. ... Table 1. Average log test densities over 10 random splits of the data.

13 Feb 2023: Finallywe train the best model on these four folds and compute an independent test error on theremaining fold. ... Table 1 Mean test error and standard error on the low contrast dataset.

13 Feb 2023: Figure 8(a) shows test set log likelihoods for 10 ran-dom divisions of the data into training and test sets. ... test. dat. a. SFAAFA NS. FA. Fig 9. Test set log likelihoods on Prostate cancer dataset from Yu et al.

13 Feb 2023: the test log-likelihood on a symmetric logscale as the discrepancy is very large. ... Test MSE on real-world regression problems (lower isbetter). 5.2. Approximation quality.