Search

13 Feb 2023: Initially, a largenumber of features are added, which provides improvements in the test likelihood. ... Table 2 summarises the data and shows thatall approaches had similar test-likelihood performance.

13 Feb 2023: Figure 1 shows the training points, test points, decision boundary from GPCand decision boundary from robust GPC. ... We created 10 pairs of training and test sets by randomlydividing the whole data set into two.

27 Jan 2023: Satellitehas a training set of 4435, a test set of 2000 with 6 classes and 36 variables. ... UCI digit data set has a trainingset of 3823, a test set of 1797, 10 classes and 64 variables.

13 Feb 2023: Additionally, for the test set, wemake use of the Negative Log Predictive Probability (NLPP). ... For training we extract 400consecutive data points, while we test on the following 500data points.

13 Feb 2023: Figure 1 shows the training points, test points, decision boundary from GPCand decision boundary from robust GPC. ... We created 10 pairs of training and test sets by randomlydividing the whole data set into two.

13 Feb 2023: Results are statistically significantrespect to a paired Wilcoxon test on a 95% confidence inter-val. ... Figure 3. Autoencoder reconstructions of unseen test images forthe MNIST (top) and CIFAR-10 (bottom) datasets.

27 Jan 2023: The nearestblock’s GP is used to predict at a given test point. ... At test time, a test point is simply assigned tothe nearest cluster center.

13 Feb 2023: The test data is created by randomlyselecting 10% of the data points and setting them as missing. ... 0.5. 1. 1.5. 2. 2.5. 3. PARAFAC. Probabilistic NTF. Test Train.

13 Feb 2023: Non-parametric tests,e.g. the Wilcoxon rank sum test, are superior to the t -test in this case. ... The integers in the parantheses is the total test error numberover the 10 folds.

13 Feb 2023: improve the likelihood of both the training dataand of held-out test data. ... The split criterion defined by equation 3.13 can be viewed as a likelihoodratio test.