Search

19 Jun 2024: Test error for the center variable versus wall-clock time. Figure: ResNet20 on CIFAR-10 with 4 workers (on the left) and 16 workers (on the right). ... Test error for the center variable versus wall-clock time. Figure: ResNet20 on CIFAR-10.

19 Jun 2024: Table 2 shows p-values for paired t-tests examining outperformance of each model compared to the baseline HMMv approach. ... Figure 2 shows the TOM test accuracies for all the models trained using Hamming distance as before.

19 Jun 2024: We evaluate the test set of fours, sevens, and nines with our BNN. ... This group was able to reach an accuracyof 88% on unseen test points.

25 Jun 2024: The cooperative immediately creates strong economic pressure on all members to reduce emissions.

19 Jun 2024: would we have to give up so that the predictionfor the test point would change? ... 2017)), and then we constrain fora random test point to obtain counterfactual accuracy.

19 Jun 2024: For every𝑓 , we evaluated its fidelity and its task performance,using a held-out sample test set. ... 96.4 0.5%on a held-out test set (averaged over 5 runs).

19 Jun 2024: Naturally incorporate spatial information. • Applications from economics to machine learning.

19 Jun 2024: For Iris [Dua and Graff, 2017], we train our modelto 96% test accuracy. ... 45). Table 2: Faithfulness µF averaged over a test set: (Zero Baseline,Training Average Baseline).

19 Jun 2024: pre-dictive distribution obtained by an exactly-trained GP, and(ii) predictive RMSE on test sets. ... Figure 8: Approximate GP regression results on Bostondataset. Reported numbers are average test RMSE, alongwith bootstrap estimates of standard error

19 Jun 2024: Test error for the center variableversus wall-clock time (original plot on the left and zoomed onthe right). ... Test loss is reported in Figure 13 in the Supplement. Finally, in Figure 6 we report theempirical results for ResNet50run on ImageNet.