Search

8 Mar 2000: This corpus spanned January to May 1997 and thus pre-dated the TREC-7 test data. ... 39.73. 44.15. Table 2: Average Precision on the TREC-7 SDR test collection with mean number of query terms in parenthesis.

27 Jul 2020: A technique that optimises the length of individual n-grams is proposed, and experimental tests show it to lead to improved results.

14 Jun 2004: Test Data. to be completed. For testing with some decoders (e.g. ... ge204@watch$ /home/solveb/hub5/htkbin/bin.i686/HRConvert.090302 /home/widowb/ears/bn-E/exp/eval98-test/hmms/hrconvert.cfg -a hmm164/MMF -b xwrd.clustered.mlist -c hmm164/RMF |

7 Oct 2001: The final HTK system yielded an overall word error rate of 22.0% on the 1996 unpartitioned broadcast news development test data and just 16.2% on the evaluation test set - ... Work on relevance feedback, both on the the test collection, and on a (larger)

8 Mar 2000: Two versions of the HTK system were used in the experiments on TREC-6 SDR test data. ... This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on the TREC-6 test data and ran in about 50 times real time.

22 Sep 2005: Using just the target test show for Ewas not effective. ] The DER on the. ... E. uses the test data (unsupervised). Concatenation () and MAP adapted ( ) results are given.

21 Feb 2022: Business Language Testing Service (BULATS) Spoken Tests. • Example of a test of communication skills A. ... NICT Japanese Learner English (JLE) • Manual transcription of interviews from English oral proficiency test. •

19 Jun 2023: Feedback 140. Speech Processing. 21. Free speaking prompt-response tests – speak for up to 1 minute. ... INTERSPEECH 2020. • S. McKnight et al, “Automatic Assessment of Conversational Speaking Tests”, UK Speech C.

24 Jul 2003: Backchannels not labelled separately in the training data.• Only the test data has reference ctm/mdtm files. - ... Bigram SULMs give largest reductions in %Err when combined with the PFM(using the current training and test data!). •

20 Feb 2018: Adaptatation to a very small amountof sad speech data also resulted in considerably sadder prosody, as confirmed bypreference tests. ... A t-test(p<0.05) on the two samples confirmed that the samples are not statisticallydistinguishable.