Search

19 Nov 2010: The two forms of modified tail distribution modelling were inves-tigated on the 1998 Hub4 partitioned evaluation test set. ... The test was performed on a subset of the 1997 par-titioned evaluation that was used for development [4].

21 Feb 2022: Automate (English) spoken language assessment & learning• without simplifying/limiting form of test: “free speaking”• possibility for richer, interactive, tests• desire to assess communication skills. ... 4/45. Spoken Language Assessment &

20 Feb 2018: He & Youngdetail the test data extraction process in [3]. Since the ATIS databaseis relatively large, all categories are treated as non-enumerable.1. ... over results reportedby He & Young using the HVS model on the same test set [4], but1.4% lower

8 Mar 2000: Figure 3: Network prediction on training and test data. Actual output[.

20 Feb 2018: It is also important that theparticipants do not interact before the test is started. ... The con-fusion matrix can be trained on phone-labelled test output datafrom an ASR system.

10 Jan 2005: NIST,. Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT),.

20 Feb 2018: The aim of the experiment was to test the robustness and performance of a spoken dialogue system in a moving car. ... The resulting speech database was further split into a training set (60%) and a test set (40%).

16 Sep 2003: Procedure. Training only Test onlyBoth dictionaries. single variant. substitutions. insertion. deletionsorA B C. ... Pronunciation variants in training and test. Combining different strategies in training and test.

12 Apr 2005: For MLLR mean adaptation, a. SystemAdapt Test Set WER (%)Config eval03 dev04 dev04f. ... This system wasevaluated on botheval03 and dev04 test sets and comparedwith the SATDIAGC system.

8 Sep 2010: Test set A was used as the development set for tuningparameters for all systems, such as the penalty factor Cfor SVMs. ... The integratedtraining yielded a 9% reduction in error rate. The full results for all three test sets are shown in TableII.