Search

17 Jan 2022: The Climate Code Foundation would have a sounder […]/p By: Economics of open-source publishing « Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week /pmr/2011/10/06/the-scholarly-poor-industry/#comment-3115 ... Economics of open-source publishing « Sauropod

17 Jan 2022: of content in all formats, that is content mining, enables access to undiscovered public knowledge and provides important insights across every aspect of our economic, social and cultural life. ... tools for education and research/p/blockquote /li li

17 Jan 2022: On Saturday we are having an economics hackathon in London. I’d love to be there but unfortunately am going to the Eur Sem Web Conf in Montpelier.

17 Jan 2022: Fact of the matter was, technology had forever changed the economics of the music business, and Jobs could see it. ... Think about science publishing…. The economics of science publishing is completely crazy for this day and age….

17 Jan 2022: Where: Clement House (D602), London School of Economics, London, UK (Programme: programme page.

17 Jan 2022: All of which makes good sense. So no magic remedy from economic theory, but a good indication we are on the right track… There are subsequent posts…. ... Pingback: Unilever Centre for Molecular Informatics, Cambridge - Jim Downing » Blog Archive »

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. JailBreaking the PDF. Posted on May 21, 2013 by pm286. The Scholarly Revolution #scholrev is forging ahead. Alexander Garcia Castro is running a fantastic hackathon n Montpelier immediately after the SePublica Polemics

17 Jan 2022: Here’s her home page, splendidly called the The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics. ... Technically, this is within reach. All that is needed is a little imagination, to reconsider the economics of scholarly communications from a poetic viewpoint.

17 Jan 2022: Removing socio-economic obstacles to access, allowing access to source files, and creating a culture of inclusion and participation were recurring themes.

17 Jan 2022: Moedas continues:. In my view, there is a strong economic, scientific and moral case for embracing open science. ... I agree these are the fundamentals. The economic case is very strong, but it is very badly presented by Open Access enthusiasts.