Search

12 Jul 2005: In this work, FMMs are synthetically repopulated in a manner that achieves bothhigher manifold sample density, as well as some generalization to unseen modesof variation (see work by Martinez [24], and ... 24] A. M. Martinez, Recognizing imprecisely

10 Jan 2005: Nelson and D. H. Pretorius. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound inMedicine and Biology, 24(9):1243–1270, 1998. ... Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(4–5):705–713, February 2003. [13] G. Treece, R. Prager, and Gee.

8 Aug 2005: CS 4.38FL 14.8102RL 185.6105DL 0.08103. CS 4.14FL 8.7102RL 137.0105DL 0.06103. CS 3.49FL 24.94102RL 4.73105DL 5.27103. ... CS 3.07FL 27.88102RL 24.7105DL 1.126103. Figure 4: Hand template matching Rows show some of the images where using the data

9 Aug 2005: A@/! M$1FGq@/(r-5n&&G L!O 1c6GZs M1FC!(D.GIC51( F./1(./M&-5!Ct@!C!1 ( Z)6(3I8suFvw!4.C! Z1( n1X) 1(T ATC @! '? 24

9 Aug 2005: Equality at. A : From (24) we find thatf 4 A 6 j 4 d 6. ... 3. Equality of the first derivative at A : From (24) we find that.

28 Jul 2005: Alam et al. [24] among others have noted that speckle tracking inthis form is suboptimal for elastography, because tissue compression causes both displacements(which are estimated) as well as within-window

18 Jan 2005: E[. (J†δ)(J†δ)T]. = J†E[. δδT]. J†T. = (J T J)1 (24). ... 23). Analogously to Eq. (24), imagelocations are assumed corrupted by independent Gaussiannoise with σ = 1 pixel.

21 Dec 2005: related method of Riklin-Raviv and Shashua [24]. On the other hand, the 3D mor-. ... mateµ̂(Di) is given by the following expression:. µ̂(Di) =. j. αjG(Di; µj, σj), (24).

9 Aug 2005: 23.5. 24. 24.5. 25. 25.5. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20. %

9 Aug 2005: 73&)24!""K!{¢ I1[TS[Ma_XJ&:a[L5U£ [M3[TOL(¤O,Ls¥UIUL51Uc5=)0F0324!95c = c<-Cj,j,j. ... L5t$U3Ï[L$b,Ã=¿)71>'24<!'<;/"642B'0324),!"csjj&$. s"03)w!>Æ;24-),646B8% Ð!<24!$03<?71624!8732B!03!