Search

21 Mar 2006: Due to the smoothness of faces, each track corre-sponds to an appearance manifold [2, 22, 24], as illustratedin Fig. ... 24] B. Moghaddam and A. Pentland. Principal manifolds and probabilis-tic subspaces for visual recognition.PAMI, 24(6), 2002.2, 3.

22 Nov 2006: In addition to training GI models for BN systems theuse of Gender Dependent (GD) models has been found tobe advantageous [24]. ... 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.2612. 14. 16. 18. 20. 22.

19 Mar 2006: 24] P. S. Penev. Dimensionality reduction by sparsification in a local-features representation of human faces. ... Ross and A. Jain. Information fusion in biometrics.PatternRecognition Letters, 24(13):2115–2125, 2003.

22 Nov 2006: ãtj = max{atj , amin} (24). whereãtj is the floored scale factor andamin is the scale floor.In this paper,amin of 0.1 was used.

19 Sep 2006: Cambridge University Press, 1999. [FB81] FISCHLER M., BOLLES R.: Random sample consensus:A paradigm for model-fitting with applications to image analysisand automated cartography.CACM 24, 6 (1981), 381–395.

22 Nov 2006: This sensitivity to outliers is a well known feature of the MMI criterion [24]. ... j))}. (24). Each Gaussian component is assumed to be independent of all others.

30 Mar 2006: Examples includequasistatic compression imaging [26, 29], axial shear wave imaging [32] and acoustic radiationforce imaging in both quasistatic/impulsive [24] and dynamic [2] forms. ... We substitute this into Equation 24, and rearrange to produce a

21 Sep 2006: 24] and for exem-plar templates by Toyama and Blake [43]. However, it is acknowledged that“one problem withexemplar sets is that they can grow exponentially with object complexity. ... We take inspiration from Jojicet al.[24] whomodeled a video

22 Nov 2006: The set of parameters,Θ(sm),. 1Using this form of auxiliary function yields the same update formulae asusing the extended Baum-Welch (EBW) algorithm [24], [25]. ... Wmpem =B2D. 2m B1Dm B0β. (c)m Dm. (23). where. B2 = Σ̂m (24).

14 Sep 2006: ln = 40.80RMS= 24.85. ln = 78.35RMS= 26.56. ln = 98.72RMS = 12.67. ... ln = 30.47RMS= 13.12. ln = 54.29RMS= 24.98. Figure 6:Pose Detection:This illustrates results from applying the GMM learnt from 8k marginaland 2k joint data points with 50