Search

10 Apr 2000: M S TM 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81. ... 1F3 36.4 32.7 35.3 33.9F4 28.6 25.0 25.4 24.4F5 28.6 23.8 27.1 26.5FX 58.5 55.2 56.8

8 Mar 2000: 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 0 5 10 15 20 25. ... Comparing Table 4 with Table 3the advantage of including two passes can clearly be seen: onBNeval98 the error rate was reduced by 24% while the overallcomputation was increased by about a

25 Oct 2000: Figure 2: Resultsfrom the existing SpaceCarving algorithm using different thresholdsettings. The voxel array size was , and the thresholdswere 48,32,24,16(of 255)respectively. ... Figure 4: Resultsfrom the existing SpaceCarving algorithm using different

8 Mar 2000: This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on. the TREC-6 test data. ... 1 77.3 17.5 5.2 5.9 28.6HTK-2 80.8 14.6 4.6 4.9 24.1.

17 Oct 2000: 704/c 26.3 15.570a/b 10.3 1.970f/d 18.8 7.670w/c 24.2 15.8. Table 1: Lattice error rates for several development test speakerswith ... a fg 14.24 —HMM-2 thresh. b fg 13.81 —HMM-2 thresh. c fg 13.71 6.68.

10 May 2000: ID BASE BRF UBRF3k 22.2 24.4 33.37k 33.8 37.5 44.3. 14k 41.4 47.6 51.827k 43.0 49.7 53.855k 43.5

12 May 2000: There are several techniques which can successfully generate this voxelarray from single sweeps [24]. ... Figure 1(a), forinstance, shows two sweeps from a liver examination which have been interpolated using thevoxel nearest neighbour [24] interpolation.

19 Apr 2000: Of the 110 seconds worth of “news” rejected by the sys-tem with shorter windows, 24 seconds was due to an inter-view with Bill Clinton being re-broadcast, and the

26 Apr 2000: Althoughvolume graphics (the storage and display of volumetric data as opposed to polygonal surfaces)has advanced considerably over the last decade [14, 24], most surfaces are still defined aspolygonal models, and ... the skeleton representation [2]and

8 Mar 2000: Test Data Adaptation ClassesSubset None Global MultipleNM/FB 26.7 24.8 22.3BM/FB 41.2 32.8 31.3NM/RB 58.5 40.7 36.5Overall 36.4 ... HMM-2/1 trans fg 27.2 18.8 26.4 32.6 24.1 29.6 21.1 48.2HMM-2/2 trans fg 26.9 18.7 26.2

8 Mar 2000: M S T. M 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81.

5 Oct 2000: Lattices were generated on the training set using a bigramLM. The bigram 1-best hypotheses had a 24.6% word error rate(WER) and a Lattice WER (LWER) of 6.2%.

25 Oct 2000: 7] M.A. FischlerandR.C.Bolles.Randomsampleconsensus:A paradigmfor modelfitting with applicationsto imageanalysisandautomatedcartography. CACM, 24(6):381–395,June1981. [8] R.I.

1 Jun 2000: 36. 23. 35. 24. 34. 25. 33. 26. 32. 27. 31. ... 19. 3. 20. 2. 21. 1. 2223. 36. 24. 35. 25.

10 Apr 2000: an Average Precision (AveP) of 55.88 obtained on referencetranscriptions, 55.08 on our own transcriptions (24.8% WER)and 44.15 on transcriptions from DERA [17] (61.5% WER) onthe ... high 39.97% 0.24% 54.65% 1.54%Slide low 59.41% 0.17% 68.35% 1.38%L=10s

10 Apr 2000: Theoverall system gave a WER of 24.8% which corre-sponded to a Processed Term Error Rate [11] (whichmore closely represents the error rate as seen by theretriever) of 32.1%.

10 Apr 2000: Corr Ins Sub Del WERROBERT VITO 166 19 56 8 36%RON HOFSTETTER 27 4 48 22 76%BUFFALO TIGER 14 3 18 2 67%FX 188 24 115 32 50% ... 24 Files Required for Processing. ;;;; more comments about the format/condition categories;;a960523 1 Ted_Koppel 399.063

10 Apr 2000: SPI Post RS NRS NS #Dup AveP R-PY B 96.0 39.39 27.42 752913 - -N B 95.8 37.52 24.92 698461 - -Y A 78.3 ... InProc. TREC-7, NIST SP 500-242, pages 1–24, Gaithersburg, MD. Introduction. Description of Task and Data.

31 Jul 2000: 0885–2308/00/020137 24 $35.00/0 c 2000 Academic Press. 138 M. Saraçlaret al.

10 Apr 2000: 39.77Condition Match(%) 54.19 17.24 19.70 21.18 25.12 11.82 24.63 42.86 41.38Total Match(%) 58.12 1.88 2.50 2.50 ... 45 35.96 39.90 49.75 53.20 53.20 29.06 27.09 53.69Total Match(%) 20.00 24.38 25.00 56.25 58.12 51.25