Search
Search Funnelback University
121 -
140 of
1,000
search results for KaKaoTalk:ZA31 24 24 |u:mi.eng.cam.ac.uk
where 0
match all words and 1,000
match some words.
Results that match 1 of 2 words
-
The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 00:0, 1–24. c© 2006, ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/swsy06.pdf20 Feb 2018: The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 00:0, 1–24. c 2006, Cambridge University PressDOI: 10.1017/S000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom. -
Part Name Part Image Part Weight [mg] Electric, Motor ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/IALego/helicopter_files/helicopter_weights.pdf1 Jan 2024: 1300. Light Bluish Gray Technic, Gear 24 Tooth (New Style. with Single Axle Hole). -
ICSLPDataCollection-10
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/wiyo04b.pdf20 Feb 2018: Per-turn. WER. Per-dialog WER. None 2 6 24 83 % 0 % 0 % Low 4 12 48 83 % 32 % 28 % Med 4 12 48 77 % 46 % 41 % Hi 2 6 24 ... Dataset. Metrics (task & user sat). R2 Significant predictors. ALL User-S 52 % 1.03 Task ALL User-C 60 % 5.29 Task – 1.54 -
POLICY OPTIMISATION OF POMDP-BASED DIALOGUE SYSTEMS WITHOUT…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/ghtt12.pdf20 Feb 2018: 1.2% 2.0%Request 17.4% 24.5% 18.4% 24.4%. ... 24, no. 4, pp. 562–588, 2010. [22] J Peters and S Schaal, “Natural Actor-Critic,” Neurocomput-ing, vol. -
ERROR SIMULATION FOR TRAINING STATISTICAL DIALOGUE SYSTEMS Jost…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/scty07b20 Feb 2018: POMDP-based Hidden Information State (HIS) DialogueSystem [22, 24]. ... of ICASSP, Honolulu, HI, 2007. [24] B. Thomson, J. Schatzmann, K. -
Emotion Conversion using F0 Segment Selection Zeynep Inanoglu, Steve…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/inyo08.pdf20 Feb 2018: wwpos 24.52 11.29 18.47wspos 11.33 4.91 3.31wpof s 1.13 4.82 8.82wppof s 24.27 6.49 10.54wonset 15.08 0.33 ... 47.3% 52.7%. 75.3% 24.7%. Figure 3: Categorical quality ratings for spectral conversion duration conversion HMM-based contour generation. -
POLICY COMMITTEE FOR ADAPTATION IN MULTI-DOMAIN SPOKEN…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/gmsv15.pdf20 Feb 2018: 24, no. 2, pp. 395–429, Apr. 2010. [8] Pierre Lison, “Multi-policy dialogue management,” inProceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference, Strouds-burg, PA, USA, 2011, SIGDIAL ’11, pp. ... 24, no. 4,pp. 562–588, 2010. [18] T Jebara, R Kondor, and A -
ON-LINE POLICY OPTIMISATION OF BAYESIAN SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEMS…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/gbhk13.pdf20 Feb 2018: 3.3. The agenda-based simulated user. The agenda-based user simulator [24, 25] factorises the user stateinto an agenda and a goal. ... 23] TopTable, “TopTable,” 2012, https://www.toptable.com. [24] J Schatzmann, Statistical User and Error Modelling -
The Effect of Cognitive Load on a Statistical Dialogue ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/gtht12.pdf20 Feb 2018: Computer Speech and Language,24(4):562–588. O Tsimhoni, D Smith, and P Green. ... Computer Speech andLanguage, 24(2):150–174. -
LEARNING BETWEEN DIFFERENT TEACHER AND STUDENT MODELS IN ASR ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~mjfg/ALTA/ASRU2019_TS.pdf20 Dec 2019: The derivatives of the per-frame. observation log-likelihoods with respects to the parameters are [24]. ... Work in [24] suggests several methods to improve gra-dient descent training of a GMM. -
BAYESIAN DIALOGUE SYSTEM FOR THE LET’S GO SPOKEN DIALOGUE ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/tykg10.pdf20 Feb 2018: In control tests by humanusers, the success rate of the system was 24.5% higher thanthe baseline Lets Go! ... Com-pared to the BASELINE system, the BUDSLETSGO systemimproves the dialogue success rate by 24.5% and the worderror rate by 9.7%. -
tech.dvi
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/bghk13.pdf20 Feb 2018: 24, pp. 562–588, 2010. [3] G. Aist, J. Allen, E. Campana, C. ... 24] M. Henderson, M. Gašić, B. Thomson, P. Tsiakoulis, K.Yu,and S. -
PROBABLISTIC MODELLING OF F0 IN UNVOICED REGIONS IN HMM ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/ytgk09.pdf20 Feb 2018: The static feature set comprised 24 Mel-Cepstral coefficients,logarithm of F0 and aperiodic energy components in five frequency. ... 12 sentences werethen randomly selected to make up a testset for each listener, leadingto 24 wave files pairs (12 for -
Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Micro-Turn Management Dongho Kim,…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/kgbt14.pdf20 Feb 2018: 0.24. 0.22. 0.20. 0.18. 0.16. Log-. likel. ihoo. dpe. rmic. ro-tu. ... 24, no. 4, pp. 562–588, 2010. [14] SpaceBook. EC FP7/2011-16, grant number 270019. -
Combining I-vector Representation and Structured Neural Networks for…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~mjfg/icassp16_wu.pdf5 Apr 2016: Speech andSignal Processing, ICASSP 2015, South Brisbane, Queens-land, Australia, April 19-24, 2015, 2015, pp. ... IEEE, 2015, pp. 4315–4319. [24] Mark JF Gales, “Cluster adaptive training of hidden markovmodels,” Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE -
Towards Using Conversations with Spoken Dialogue Systems in…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/lygk16.pdf20 Feb 2018: Corpus Mean (SD) Grades Correlationn Human Auto R p. L 21 24.2 (3.1) 17.1 (1.9). ... 69C 50 24.0 (3.0) 15.6 (3.3). 59. 01. Table 2: Mean (standard deviation) of human andautomated grades, along with Pearson’s correla-tions between the human and -
Dialogue Context Sensitive Speech Synthesis using Factorized Decision …
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/tgbh14.pdf20 Feb 2018: In mostcases, a data-driven approach is followed, either by detect-ing/annotating emphasized words in existing corpora [23, 10] orby collecting speech corpora specifically designed for emphasismodeling [24]. ... Appointment Booking Task -
Cross-Lingual Spoken Language Understanding from Unaligned Data…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/lemy10.pdf20 Feb 2018: on Mancorpora)a 91.40 90.17 90.24. 90.20Auto (Google MT) 90.81 90.77 87.72 89.223. ... 24, no. 2, pp. 150–174, April 2010. [8] P. Koehn, H. -
Learning from Real Users: Rating Dialogue Success with Neural ...
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/svgk15.pdf20 Feb 2018: 24, pp. 562–588, 2010. [20] M. Lukoeviius and H. Jaeger, “Reservoir computing approachesto recurrent neural network training,” Computer Science Review,vol. ... abs/1412.2306, 2014. [24] G. Mesnil, Y. Dauphin, K. Yao, Y. Bengio, L. -
Evaluation of Statistical POMDP-basedDialogue Systems in Noisy…
mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/ybgh14.pdf20 Feb 2018: When errors are correlated belief tracking is less accurate be-cause it tends to over-estimate alternatives in the N-best list[24]. ... 24, no. 4, pp. 562–588, 2010. 17. T. Minka, “Expectation Propagation for Approximate Bayesian Inference,” in
Refine your results
Search history
Recently clicked results
Recently clicked results
Your click history is empty.
Recent searches
Recent searches
Your search history is empty.