Search

27 Jan 2023: M. (draft) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Oct 24 and Oct 27. ... Nov 21 and Nov 24. Sampling and. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods.

19 Nov 2023: Feb 24. Model comparison (1L): Bayes factors, Occam's razor, BIC, Laplace approximations.

13 Feb 2023: J> #. 6? 1. 'R. 4. &S. 2B. " S " ". R. 24. 6 1 ". 0 "Q ". " 1 " 2B 24.

27 Jan 2023: Nov 24 and Nov 27. Sampling Methods. Monte Carlo:. simple Monte Carlo,.

19 Nov 2023: Feb 22, 24. Variational approximations (2L): KL divergences, mean field, expectation propagation.

13 Feb 2023: Eachof the 24 hiddenunits in the middle hiddenlayerwas connectedto 9 consecutive visible units from eacheye,i.e. ... e), 1-24-36(b,f),1-48-72(c,g), 1-72-108(d,h).

19 Nov 2023: Feb 24, 25. Model comparison (1L): Bayes factors, Occam's razor, BIC, Laplace approximations.

27 Jan 2023: Week 14/15 (April 24, 29, May 1). Model Selection. Bayes Factors.

19 Nov 2023: Feb 3, 6, 10, 13. Probabilistic Ranking. Feb 17, 20, 24, 27, Mar 3, 6.

19 Nov 2023: 875 316.69 1962.958 317.70 1963.042 318.74 1963.125 319.08 1963.208 319.86 1963.292 321.39 1963.375 322.24 1963.458 321.47 ... 24 1964.458 321.89 1964.542 320.44 1964.625 318.70 1964.708 316.70 1964.792 316.79 1964.875 317.79 1964.958 318.71 1965.042

19 Nov 2023: a probability? Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 10 / 24. ... Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 24 / 24.

19 Nov 2023: Rasmussen and Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 5 / 24. ... Rasmussen and Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 24 / 24.

19 Nov 2023: Rasmussen and Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 5 / 24. ... Rasmussen and Ghahramani Lecture 10 and 11: Text and Discrete Distributions 24 / 24.

27 Jan 2023: Eachof the 24 hiddenunits in the middle hiddenlayerwas connectedto 9 consecutive visible units from eacheye,i.e. ... e), 1-24-36(b,f),1-48-72(c,g), 1-72-108(d,h).

19 Nov 2023: 64. 20. 24. 6. 6. 4. 2. 0. 2. 4. 6. ... Rasmussen Gaussian Processes October 23th, 2023 24 / 27. 43. 21.

19 Nov 2023: Reading 12-14 15-17 18-20 21-23 24-26 27-29 30-32Frequency 3 5 10 16 18 12 6.

19 Nov 2023: 4.40 5.00 13.24 4.84 3.31 11.54 7.42 9.39 3.75 1.39 13.89 31.38 17.48 11.91 2.26

19 Nov 2023: 64. 20. 24. 6. 6. 4. 2. 0. 2. 4. 6.

19 Nov 2023: 64. 20. 24. 6. 6. 4. 2. 0. 2. 4. 6.

19 Nov 2023: 1 0 1 22. 1. 0. 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. ... 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. 4. M=1.

19 Nov 2023: 1. 0. 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. ... 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. 4. M=1.

19 Nov 2023: 1. 0. 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. ... 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. 4. M=1.

27 Jan 2023: 4 5 3 5 3 5 4 3. 24. 34. 33. ... 32. 24. 45. 54. 35. 55. 34. 44. 44. 4. 35.

19 Nov 2023: 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. 4. M=1. ... p(x, y)dy = p(x):. wkp(w)dw =. wk(. p(wk, w/k)dw/k. )dwk =. wkp(wk)dwk. Rasmussen & Ghahramani (CUED) Lecture 3 and 4: Gaussian Processes 24 / 32.

19 Nov 2023: 1. 2M=0. 1 0 1 24. 2. 0. 2. 4. M=1. ... p(x, y)dy = p(x):. wkp(w)dw =. wk(. p(wk, w/k)dw/k. )dwk =. wkp(wk)dwk. Quiñonero-Candela & Rasmussen (CUED) Lecture 3 and 4: Gaussian Processes 24 /

27 Jan 2023: 24{1{24{45.Wiley{Interscience, New York.

19 Nov 2023: Dataset Data dim. Sample size MLE Regression Corr. dim.Swiss roll 3 1000 2.1(0.02) 1.8(0.03) 2.0(0.24)Faces 64 64 698 4.3

13 Feb 2023: 1.23). subject to:. wt φt(xn, ynt) wt φt(xn, yt) Mynt,yt ξnt n, t, yt (1.24). ... We end up having a significant reduction in the number ofconstraints2 in our optimisation formulation for CGMs in (1.23)-(1.24).

13 Feb 2023: GPC log-ev -24.40.6 -41.80.8 -51.81.1 -60.21.0error(%) 3.700.36 4.900.77 7.500.88 8.151.42. robust log-ev ... MS-robust- log-ev -24.40.6 -41.00.7 -50.50.7 -58.60.8GPC error(%) 3.700.36 4.540.62 6.760.76 6.850.73.

13 Feb 2023: a total of 24 time points). B.cinerea spores (suspended in half-strength grape juice) germinate, penetrate theleaf and cause expanding necrotic lesions. ... This model is related to mixtures of Gaussian process experts, whichhave been studied previously

13 Feb 2023: gauss 78.54% 50.22% 61.26%34 classes. vanilla 70.24% 78.94% 74.34%link34 100 73.19% 79.24& 76.10%.

27 Jan 2023: 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 7 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 19 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 270. ... 0.2231.24. 3.6. 59.9. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 74.

13 Feb 2023: Afterexamining the results for all 24 configurations, weselected the best one:α = 0.25 andλ = 0.5. ... of 11DUC 2004 Task 4b 24 0.4067 [0.3883, 0.4251] Between 2 & 3 of 11.

27 Jan 2023: A factor analyzer with 24 hidden units discoversglobal features with both excitatory and inhibitory components (gure 9a). ... a) Weights from the top layer hidden unit to the 24 middle-layer hidden units.

13 Feb 2023: More on this topiccan be found in [7], [24].Linear MPC It is worth to remark that even though this is a con-strained nonlinear MPC problem it can be used ... 24] Zheng A., Morari M., Stability of model predictive control with mixedconstraints, IEEE Trans.

13 Feb 2023: Ext [c(xt)] =. c(xt)N. (xt |µt, Σt. )dxt , (24). t = 0,. ... 10)–(12), (24).7: Gradient-based policy improvement, see. Sec. 2.3: get dJπ(θ)/ dθ, Eqs.

13 Feb 2023: Publications, Machine Learning Group, Department of Engineering, Cambridge. current group:. [former members:. [by year:. [2022. James Urquhart Allingham, Florian Wenzel, Zelda E Mariet, Basil Mustafa, Joan Puigcerver, Neil Houlsby, Ghassen Jerfel,

13 Feb 2023: While [23, 24] represent the formalism of first-orderlogic by factor graph models, [27] and [29] deal with Bayesian networks appliedto first-order logic. ... 1094–1099. AAAI Press(2008). 24. Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Markov Logic Networks.

13 Feb 2023: Using the definition of S in (24), the productof the two Gaussians in (36) results in a new (unnormalized) Gaussianc14 N(xt1 |ψi, Ψ) with. ... 24] J. Kocijan, R. Murray-Smith, C. E. Rasmussen, and B. Likar, “PredictiveControl with Gaussian Process

13 Feb 2023: Lij = ki(u)kj (u) |2Λ1S I|12 (24). exp[2(u xd)>Λ1(2Λ1 S1)1Λ1(u xd). ],.

27 Jan 2023: w(t, c) =. i:ti<t,si=c. k(t ti) =. eλ(tti) (24). λw(t, c) =. i:ti<t,si=c. (t ti)eλ(tti) (25). We then take a

13 Feb 2023: For the Gym tasks, weemploy an extension [24] of the DMP framework [12] toefficiently generate goal-directed trajectories. ... 16, no. 5, pp. 1190–1208, 1995. [24] J. Kober, K. Mülling, O.

13 Feb 2023: 50.27 (86) 0.24 (92) 0.15 0.18 0.40 (85) 0.02 0.12 0.09. ... 0.27 (26) 0.13 (25) 0.03 0.11 0.31 (24) -0.89 -0.80 -0.65100 64.6 2.1 59.0 3.6 58.5 2.9

13 Feb 2023: The Infinite Hidden Markov Model. Matthew J. Beal Zoubin Ghahramani Carl Edward Rasmussen. Gatsby Computational Neuroscience UnitUniversity College London. 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, Englandhttp://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk. {m.beal,zoubin,edward

13 Feb 2023: Vol. 28 no. 24 2012, pages 3290–3297BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts595. Systems biology Advance Access publication October 9, 2012. ... Expression 7.66 1.15 9.48 551. ChIPþPPI 27.04 3.47 18.99 31ChIPþExpression 24.46 2.93

27 Jan 2023: 21). Given s, the distribution of Z becomes:. p( Z | x , s, µ ( 1 : ) ) p( Z | x , µ ( 1 : ) ) 1µ I (0 s µ ) (24).

13 Feb 2023: Table 1. Log-likelihood/sample size. Initial value EM DAEM SMEM. Training. Mean 159.1 148.2 147.9 145.1Std 1.77 0.24 0.04 0.08.

13 Feb 2023: 24, no. 5, pp. 707–711, 2002. [6] A. Jain and J.

13 Feb 2023: Ex[σ2(x)] varx(µ(x. )) (24). where Ex indicates the expectation under x.

13 Feb 2023: L(q) = 〈log F(y, x, π′, X)p(π′)〉q(y,s,π′|X) 〈log q(y, s|X)q(π′)〉q(y,s,π′|X)(24). Since log ... IEEE Trans. Neural Networks andLearning Systems 24(1), 170–177 (2013). 8. Ghahramani, Z., Beal, M.: Propagation Algorithms for