Search

29 Oct 2018: 20). The position  of the front follows from the solution to (24) with initial conditions. ( ... ISIJ Int. 56(1), 24-36. 3. Song EJ, Suh D-W, Bhadeshia HKDH.

22 Jul 2020: composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 24, 413–431. Daghyani, H.R., Ye, L., Mai, Y.W., 1995. ... versus shear strain across the adhesive layer. 24. 0. 10. 20.

9 Dec 2004: 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. ... Composites 1993;24(6):467–74. [5] Cui W, Wisnom MR, Jones M. A comparison of failure criteria to.

22 Aug 2019: temperature have been reviewed recently by Van Loock and Fleck [24] and deformation. ... 3),. 20 We assume f to be insensitive to strain rate [24,58].

28 Feb 2014: Test plates ofLAS, of dimension 10 mm 5 mm 1 mm, were charged for 24 hoursusing each of the charging conditions listed in Table 1. ... 1, werepre-charged for 24 hours using the environments listed in Table 1.

4 Aug 2005: Revised 24 March 1998. the Cosserat and Toupin—Mindlin theories were developed for linear elastic materials. ... 1and u. 2at each ‘mid-side’ node. The total number of degrees of freedom per element is 24.

11 Feb 2022: This allows calibration of the yield. surface of the undamaged matrix material [24, 26]. ... 24. (a) R=9mm notch test DIC image at localization. (b) R=9mm notch test DIC image at failure.

29 May 2019: predictions of Tankasala et al. [24]. Consider the following 4 cases of lattice behaviour. ... 24] for aT of ductile hexagonal lattices. (iii) Imperfections in the form of solid inclusions.

30 Sep 2020: 24. 2 Geometry of specimens tested in this study. (a) Dogbone specimen for tensile properties of. ... 24. (a)P P. Ld. (b) (c). (d). (e). Figure 2: Geometry of specimens tested in this study.

29 Oct 2018: a). (b). 23. (a). (b). 24. Figure 6. (a) Remote stress versus nominal strain; (b) crack growth versus crack tip opening.