Search

23 Jul 2012: 1.24) η(ω) = {e E : ω(e) = 1}. Clearly,ω1 ω2 if and only if η(ω1) η(ω2).

11 Apr 2012: Ax,m(n)) nnr=0 hmp (r). 1. (24). Once this is proved, it follows by (23) that. ... prove (24), and the proof is essentially that of [11], Lemma 5.17.

15 Aug 2012: See [24, 51, 52] for more informa-tion and references.Few non-trivial facts are known about the limit set L, and much eort hasbeen spent, largely inconclusively, on attempting to

15 Aug 2012: Our basic strategy in proving the central limit theorem isto adapt the arguments proposed by Kipnis and Varadhan [24] and further developed byDeMasi, Ferrari, Goldstein, and Wick [10, 11]. ... One of the main properties of the chain Xω is its

15 Aug 2012: Directed percolation is closely related to the contact model, for which blockarguments have been used to prove results related to some of those describedabove (see [7, 12, 23, 24]).

20 Dec 2012: 104 5:12 104 1:32 103 2:59 103 4:37 1030.54 1:01 104 4:81 104 1:24 103 2:44 103 4:13 1030.55 ... 02 105 1:46 104 2:33 1040.88 7:64 106 3:12 105 7:24 105 1:32 104 2:11 1040.89 6:85 106 2:80 105

15 Aug 2012: 2.24) λ(C | Uj = 1) = λ(g(U ) A) λ(f (U ) A) = λ(B | Uj = 1).

15 Aug 2012: Using (5.17)–(5.18) of[22], together with estimates at the beginning of the proof of Lemma (2.24) of [29],we find that. ... We have forf W(δ1) QG/3(e1) that. τ[QG/3(f) EL1,M1. ]= QG/3(τf) EL2,M2, (24).

15 Aug 2012: φbp,q = αφ′ (1 α)φ′′. for some distinct φ′,φ′′ Rp,q. It follows by [24, Thm. ... The given statement for θ0 may be proved similarly, making use of Theorem3.2 and [24, Prop.

15 Aug 2012: limΛLd. φ0Λ(A B) = Φ0(1A(ψ)µ0ψ(B)). (7.7). 24 B. T. Graham and G.