Search
Search Funnelback University
- Refined by:
- Date: Past fortnight
1 -
10 of
38
search results for katalk:za33 24 |u:mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk
where 0
match all words and 38
match some words.
Results that match 1 of 2 words
-
Understanding the Bethe Approximation: When and How can it go Wrong?
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/pabc.pdf19 Jun 2024: 100. Maximum coupling strength y. BethelocalBethecycleBethemargTRWlocalTRWcycleTRWmarg. log partition error. 2 8 16 24 320. ... 2 8 16 24 320. 0.1. 0.2. 0.3. 0.4. Maximum coupling strength y. -
Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/poster_ICML18_BlindJustice.pdf19 Jun 2024: Bank. Datasets and Feasibility. Adult Bank COMPAS German SQFn training examples 214 215 212 29 216d features 51 62 7 24 23p sensitive attributes 1 1 7 1 1certification 802 ms -
Clamping Variables and Approximate Inference
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/newsclamp.pdf19 Jun 2024: 0.1. 0.2. 0.3. 0.4. max interaction strength W 24 / 19. -
Revisiting the Limits of MAP Inference by MWSS on Perfect Graphs
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/slides-revisit.pdf19 Jun 2024: Revisiting the Limits of MAP Inference by MWSSon Perfect Graphs. Adrian WellerUniversity of Cambridge. CP 2015Cork, Ireland. Slides and full paper athttp://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/. 1 / 21. Motivation: undirected graphical models (MRFs). • -
Clamping Variables and Approximate Inference
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/slides_msr2.pdf19 Jun 2024: 24 / 21. Error in log Z vs number of clamps: complete graphs. ... 24 / 21. Time (secs) vs error in log Z for various methods. -
Directed and Undirected Graphical Models
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/2018-MLSALT4-AW1-models.pdf19 Jun 2024: 23 / 26. Directed and undirected models are different. 24 / 26. ... Directed and undirected models are different. With <3 edges,. 24 / 26. -
Junction Tree, BP and Variational Methods
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/2018-MLSALT4-AW3-approx.pdf19 Jun 2024: 24 / 32. The log-partition function log Z. Since D(q‖p) 0, we have. ... a finite convex hull 3. M(G) = conv {φ(e), e X m} (5.24). -
The Case for Process Fairness in Learning:Feature Selection for ...
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/grgic.pdf19 Jun 2024: Age 46% 56% 32%Gender 24% 50% 22%Race 24% 35% 15%. Table 3: Comparing judgment of fairness of each feature, of 54 male users, when they have differentknowledge about the ... Age 42% 63% 33%Gender 24% 54% 23%Race 18% 43% 18%. Table 5: Comparing judgment -
Bounding the Integrality Distance ofLP Relaxations for Structured…
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/OPT2016_paper_3.pdf19 Jun 2024: 24)Using the same approach to upper-bound Equation 22, we assume, without loss of generality, that(δ(µI ) θ) µ̃L (δ(µI ) θ. ′) ... m. (25). Using Equation 25 to upper-bound 22, and Equation 24 to upper-bound 23, we have that. -
Structured Prediction Models for Chord Transcription of Music Audio…
https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/icmla09adrian.pdf19 Jun 2024: To its right, 0-1 adds the features of the previous frame, so in this model each frame is represented by 24 dimensions.
Refine your results
clear all
Date
Search history
Recently clicked results
Recently clicked results
Your click history is empty.
Recent searches
Recent searches
Your search history is empty.