Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
10 results 20 results 50 results
Relevance Date (Newest first) Date (Oldest first) Title (A-Z) Title (Z-A) Distance URL (A-Z) URL (Z-A) Shuffle
11 - 20 of 52 search results for katalk:PC53 24 / |u:mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk where 0 match all words and 52 match some words.

  1. Results that match 1 of 2 words

  2. Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/poster_ICML18_BlindJustice.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: Bank. Datasets and Feasibility. Adult Bank COMPAS German SQFn training examples 214 215 212 29 216d features 51 62 7 24 23p sensitive attributes 1 1 7 1 1certification 802 ms

  3. Clamping Variables and Approximate Inference

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/newsclamp.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: 0.1. 0.2. 0.3. 0.4. max interaction strength W 24 / 19.

  4. Natural-Gradient Variational Inference 2: ImageNet-scale · Cambridge…

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/blog/2021/11/24/ngvi-bnns-part-2.html
    12 Apr 2024: Published on 24 November 2021. This is the blog of the Cambridge Machine Learning Group.

  5. Yarin Gal awarded Research Fellowship at St Catherine’s College,…

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/news/yarin-gal-awarded-research-fellowship-at-st-catherine-college-cambridge/
    10 Apr 2024: Mar 24, 2016. Well done to Yarin Gal who has been awarded the Michael and Morven Heller Research Fellowship at St Catherine’s College, Cambridge.

  6. Clamping Variables and Approximate Inference

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/slides_msr2.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: 24 / 21. Error in log Z vs number of clamps: complete graphs. ... 24 / 21. Time (secs) vs error in log Z for various methods.

  7. Revisiting the Limits of MAP Inference by MWSS on Perfect Graphs

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/slides-revisit.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: Revisiting the Limits of MAP Inference by MWSSon Perfect Graphs. Adrian WellerUniversity of Cambridge. CP 2015Cork, Ireland. Slides and full paper athttp://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/. 1 / 21. Motivation: undirected graphical models (MRFs). •

  8. The Case for Process Fairness in Learning:Feature Selection for ...

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/grgic.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: Age 46% 56% 32%Gender 24% 50% 22%Race 24% 35% 15%. Table 3: Comparing judgment of fairness of each feature, of 54 male users, when they have differentknowledge about the ... Age 42% 63% 33%Gender 24% 54% 23%Race 18% 43% 18%. Table 5: Comparing judgment

  9. Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/ICML18-BlindJustice.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: d features 51 62 7 24 23p sensitive attr. 1 1 7 1 1certification 802 ms 827 ms 288 ms 250 ms 765 mstraining 43 min 51 min 7 min 1 ... Bennett Capers, I. Blind justice. Yale Journal of Law &Humanities, 24:179, 2012.

  10. An Introduction to LP Relaxations for MAP Inference

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/2018-MLSALT4-AW2-LP.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: x3. x4. x5. x6. s. balanced almost balanced(attractive up to flipping) 24 / 41.

  11. Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case…

    https://mlg.eng.cam.ac.uk/adrian/WWW18-HumanPerceptions.pdf
    19 Jun 2024: 47% 68% 70%B.S. 51% 32% 30%Liberal 57% 37% 33%Conservative 17% 24% 29%Moderate 21% 33% 34%Other 5% 6% 4%. ... Substance Abuse 4.84 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.24 0.07 0.68 0.26 0.22 0.20 0.07 0.284.

Refine your results

clear all

Date

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.