Search

23 Mar 2004: Eval03 with CU-HTK P1-P2 System. Overall Swbd Fisher Male Female. h5train03b LM03 24.6 28.7 20.2 25.7 23.5h5train03b LM03Fsh3896 23.9 28.2 19.3 ... 25.0 22.8fisher3896 LM03Fsh3896 23.1 27.0 18.9 24.6 21.6fisher3896h5 LM03Fsh3896 22.7 26.6 18.5 24.2 21.1.

24 Jul 2003: PFM N/A 24.88 43.98 54.61 123.47SULM bg N/A 81.30 6.32 3.56 91.19.

10 Jan 2005: Nelson and D. H. Pretorius. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound inMedicine and Biology, 24(9):1243–1270, 1998. ... Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(4–5):705–713, February 2003. [13] G. Treece, R. Prager, and Gee.

19 Apr 2000: Of the 110 seconds worth of “news” rejected by the sys-tem with shorter windows, 24 seconds was due to an inter-view with Bill Clinton being re-broadcast, and the

5 Dec 2003: CACM, 24(6):381–395, June 1981. [6] C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector.

15 Feb 2005: 1/68.8 51.7/24.8/79.8. PFMbnrt04 v1.0 tg 49.7/15.4/68.6 50.2/15.0/68.5 56.7/19.2/79.8. ... 24.4/72.5 50.7/28.6/82.7. PFMbnrt04 v1.0 cl40-tg 49.1/17.1/68.3 49.4/21.2/74.6

23 Jun 2005: 15. 16. 17. 18. SID CLR Threshold. Dev. 24 D. ER. ... Seg. men. t Im. pu. rity. on. dev. 04 (. 24 s.

9 Aug 2005: Figure 1: Variation in error at each of 24 network outputs over the course of the sentence “clear windows”. ... Figure 4 shows the MSE for both the (5,32,24) network trained on the original data and the.

10 Aug 1999: F =. 24 0 0 c0 0 da b e. 35 : (4). ... F =. 24 0 0. 0 sin0. 0 0 0 cos0sin cos p1 2 02.

8 Mar 2000: M S T. M 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81.

9 Aug 2005: Wetrained feed-forward multi-layer percep-trons with 12 inputs, 30 hidden units,24 outputs and sigmoid non-linearitiesat the hidden units using resilient back-propagation (rprop) for 1000 batch updateepochs, ... RESULTSFigure 3 shows original and

16 Mar 2005: H. Berman. Engineering a freehand 3Dultrasound system. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(4–5):757–777, 2003. ... Ultrasoundin Medicine and Biology, 24(9):1243–1270, 1998. [22] R. W. Prager, A.

25 Mar 2004: This system gave a diarisation error of 24.46% on the develop-ment and 23.85% on the evaluation data. ... Adv Seg Clust Score MetricNONE CUED MIT 24.23 PrimaryCUED TDT4 MIT MIT 28.26 Secondary.

3 Feb 2015: This isa very clean model, with no significant correlations between the covariates, the largest correlation coefficientbeing 0.24 between age and one of the site labels.

5 Oct 2000: Lattices were generated on the training set using a bigramLM. The bigram 1-best hypotheses had a 24.6% word error rate(WER) and a Lattice WER (LWER) of 6.2%.

21 Sep 2006: 21] for upper bodypose estimation. In [24] it is suggested to partition the parameter spaceof a 3D hand model using a multi-resolution grid. ... range. At detection rates of 0.99 the false positiverate for the centre template is 0.24, wheras it is

26 Jan 2015: 2.33†† (1.70, 3.21) 2.44†† (1.61, 3.71) 2.24†† (1.51, 3.31). ... Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 24 (3), 468–474. Johnell, O., Kanis, J.

19 May 2003: 3.4 100 (6.5, 4.6, -15.3) 3.4 100 (7.7, 2.1, -15.3) 4.0arm 30 100 (24.3, -5.1, -9.3) 5.1 100 ... With the full search range,the low resolution search finds a false minimum absolute difference at offset (8, 48, 24) pixels(in dividing plane coordinates).

21 Mar 2006: Due to the smoothness of faces, each track corre-sponds to an appearance manifold [2, 22, 24], as illustratedin Fig. ... 24] B. Moghaddam and A. Pentland. Principal manifolds and probabilis-tic subspaces for visual recognition.PAMI, 24(6), 2002.2, 3.

1 Sep 2006: 10] A. M. Martinez. Recognizing imprecisely localized, partially oc-cluded and expression variant faces from a single sample per class.PAMI, 24(6), 2002.