Search

21 Oct 2020: y)ArAk Manner. (20) HasanHasan. iste-mi-yerekwant-Neg-Adv. otur-dusit.down-Pst.3s. ‘Hasan sat down without wanting to.’ Kornfilt (1997; ex. ... Languages and Linguistics, 20 (1).Gallego, Á. (2010). On the prepositional nature of non-finite verbs.

21 Oct 2020: See (28) below). NB how intervention locality can reduce to (20, 21): if there’s a target in B for a B-level. ... Linguistic. Inquiry 20: 365–424. Ringe, Don. 2013. The linguistic diversity of Aboriginal Europe.

13 Oct 2020: 3. 95. 0%. 20%. 40%. 60%. 80%. 100%. EPB EI EPI EA EVA RPB RI RPI RA RVA NS. ... 0%. 20%. 40%. 60%. 80%. 100%. EPB EI EPI EA EVA RPB RI RPI RA RVA NS.

13 Oct 2020: More specifically, in the first type of answer-sets the borderline item Bdiffered from the first item which clearly does not instantiate P by 20 magni-tudes, i.e. ... P(20), and the second item which clearly does not instantiate Pby 10 magnitudes, i.e.

11 Nov 2020: 20) Linking the EA/agent and acc to the same v has the disadvantage of leaving nospace in the specifier for object shift since it is already occupied by the subject.

13 Oct 2020: 20) Matengo (Yoneda 2011:760)To explain the reason for borrowing a cooking pan from someone.

13 Oct 2020: This is illustrated for a dative objectin (20), where the speaker-proximal article is used with a first person pluralAPC. ... 20) ’namiwe.dat. Po’matsem-sePomaks.dat-det.1. no1pl.dat. naneg. p2’magahelp.3sg. ’nikutrinobody. ‘Nobody helps us

13 Oct 2020: 20) % Othe. JoãoJoão. queria=sewanted.3SG=self.3. reunirmeet.INF. àsat.the. 6.6. ‘João wanted/would like to meet at 6.’ [=11,? ... matrix subjectand PRO and (ii) this in turn is permitted because of T-to-C movement, whicheffectively prevents PRO

13 Oct 2020: 20) e.V(e)&AP(e)&theme(DP1, e)&originator(DP2, e)which means: There is a single event e in which the DP2 argument isthe originator of the action denoted

6 Oct 2020: as in (20) (cf. Kayne 2005):. (20) A: Will John come to the party?