Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
10 results 20 results 50 results
Relevance Date (Newest first) Date (Oldest first) Title (A-Z) Title (Z-A) Distance URL (A-Z) URL (Z-A) Shuffle
1 - 4 of 4 search results for TALK:PC53 20 |u:www.statslab.cam.ac.uk where 0 match all words and 4 match some words.

  1. Results that match 1 of 2 words

  2. Fair Internet traffic integration:network flow models and analysis…

    www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/PAPERS/kmbk1.pdf
    19 Nov 2004: Remark 6. Under the particular choice (20) of penalty function, and comparing equations (10)and (19), we deduce that. ... Computer Communication Review(1997) 27, 67–82. [20] Mo (J.), Walrand (J.), Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control.

  3. digress.dvi

    www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~rrw1/stats/digress.pdf
    10 Mar 2004: For θ = 251/365, p = 0.20, P(YES) = 0.387. Comparison of variances. ... variance. Determine this for the case θ = 251/365, p = 0.20, α = 1.

  4. IPCost Article – Outline

    www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/PAPERS/DHK.pdf
    10 May 2004: 30. 1600 286 1000 105 20. 1.2. 4.0 3.2 3.9 1.6 1.3. ... 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 10 20 30. Voice traffic, Erlangs.

  5. The Annals of Applied Probability2004, Vol. 14, No. 3, ...

    www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/PAPERS/AAP007.pdf
    5 Jul 2004: wj (n) =iI. Aj ini. µi, j J.(20). We callw(n) the workload associated withn. ... PROOF. This follows from Lemma 6.1 and (30)–(33). For eachn RI+, let w(n) = (wj (n) : j J) be defined by (20).

Refine your results

clear all

Date

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.