Search

10 Nov 2010: 0 20 40 60 80 10090. 95. 100. 105. 110. Radius! ... The expected flux density calculated withthis relation agrees with the flux density values both from ob-servations and from our model to within 20% at 0.57, 1.1, and1.6µm.

15 Dec 2010: 127271 39.081915 1734.49 69459.2 20.3629 1798.92 127704 24.029317 2272.84 68903.7 13.6835 2346.56 128024 15.814919 2883.61 68472.8 9.63420

6 Apr 2010: SiC 11.85 1800 VISIR 124 120 23 3 7Q2 18.72 3760 VISIR 50 119 11 9 20. ... The recent 24µm and 18µmdetections presented here suggest a lower excess than that sug-gested by IRAS photometry (275 20 mJy at 25µm).

27 Jul 2010: larly at 70µmFdiscF. = 1-5 (diamond:small excess), 5-20 (square:. medium excess), >20 (triangle: large excess). ... that extends down to 1010m,the contribution of particles less than 108m in size to the24µm disc flux is only 20%.

22 Aug 2010: 1.32 46.8 2.64 5.9 104 20 1 6HD 181327 F5/6V 1.3 51 3.1 3103 20 [86] 7,1,6,12,13 7 (Resolved

19 Feb 2010: This differentemphasis changes the values obtained in the formal fit at24 µm by 10–20%.3. ... For belts rmid = 20, 30, 40,50, 60, and 70 AU, dr = rmid/2, and η = 1.

25 Nov 2010: Integrating equation (19) yields. Dc =Dmax. (1 0.4(t tnleft)/tnleft)α. (20). where α = 1/1.2. ... When there are only Nstr largest objects left, Dcbegins to decay as dictated by Equation (20).