Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
21 - 40 of 85 search results for TALK:PC53 20 |u:www.itg.cam.ac.uk where 0 match all words and 85 match some words.
  1. Results that match 1 of 2 words

  2. 1 Jun 2006: 2= 307 J 337 J 20.0 "C. A 0.056 -. TABLE 1. ... 10. 5 -. 35 1. -. - h. E 0. 0 10 20 30 40 50.
  3. The slumping of gravity currents

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper32.pdf
    30 May 2006: 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160. t (9 FIGURE 2. ... 796 H. E. Huppert and J. E. Simpson. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70.
  4. 5 May 2006: 10. 5. 0 5 10 15 20. Figure 1. A shadowgraph image of the developing cells after 7 min. ... 1 48.2 20.3 20.3 7 1.47 1.1 4250 1.1 0.73 48.2 20 20.3 40 0.85 2.6 1810 2.7
  5. PII: S0022-0248(99)00456-X

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/grae/42.pdf
    26 Apr 2006: Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK. Received 27 March 1999; accepted 20 August 1999Communicated by D.T.J. ... h"hi#(h. =!h. i) erf (X1@2g/2), (20). where erf(x) is the error function given by.
  6. flm957.dvi

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper195.pdf
    17 May 2006: 358 D. Vella and H. E. Huppert. –2 –1 0 1 20.
  7. PII: 0022-0248(94)90038-8

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper119.pdf
    27 Apr 2006: 2.20) It is of interest to know at what value of k the. ... 1992) 487.8. References [20] V.V. Vas’kin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Metally 1)1986) 83.
  8. 30 May 2006: BLANCH, G. 1964 Mathieu Functions, chapter 20 in Handbook of Mathematical Functions (edited by M.
  9. flm145.dvi

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper197.pdf
    11 Oct 2006: t. θ. 5 10 15 20 25 3010–4. 10–3. 10–2. 10–1. ... 374 M. Ungarish and H. E. Huppert. t0 4 8 12 16 20 24.
  10. 5 May 2006: Unknown to the present authors, a similarstudy was undertaken by a French group 20. ... S. J. Sparks, and M. A. Hallworth,. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 175 2004.20 E.
  11. Gravity-driven flows in porous layers

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper125.pdf
    30 May 2006: Huppert and A. W. Woods. 0 20 40 60 80 100. ... Gravity-driven flows in porous layers 61. 100. 80. 20. FIGURE 4.
  12. Some remarks on the initiation of inertial Taylor columns

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper19.pdf
    30 May 2006: 3.20) /Om. where the kernel. and &t) is the zeroth-order Hankel transform of h ( r ) , given by. ... 20, 429-448. Ocean. I n s t. G.F.D. Notes, no. 2, pp.
  13. 26 Apr 2006: cooled and solidified from above. The apparatus consisted of a Perspex tank, withwalls 11 mm thick, of dimensions 20 20 37.6 cm with a brass lid as depicted infigure 1. ... E. Huppert. (a). 12. 8. 4. h (cm). (b). T B = – 20 C.
  14. jc002818 1..17

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/grae/66.pdf
    27 Apr 2006: 1998] of 0.20. Thecalculated mean area covered by melt ponds on first-yearice was 0.41. ... Remote Sens., 20(10), 2069–2090. Derksen, C. P., J. M. Piwowar, and E.
  15. PII: 0012-821X(82)90155-8

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper45.pdf
    27 Apr 2006: Petrol. 20 (1979) 487-554. 2 H,E. H u p p e r t and J.S. ... 100 (1980) 367-384. 20 E. Stolper and D. Walker, Melt density and the average.
  16. PII: S0022-0248(99)00290-0

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/grae/40.pdf
    26 Apr 2006: 0.4; (d) latex withG104 K m1 [20], slope! 1.0; (e) latex with G4]104 K m1 [21], slope! ... dt. dd0. dd0, (20). where d0(t"0) is the initial "lm thickness at h"0.
  17. 30 May 2006: Physics, University of Cambridge, 20 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK 2Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 lRJ, UK. ... y = 0 ( t = t,), (3.20). where t, is the time for the initial current to attain the slumping distance x,.
  18. 1 Jun 2006: Huppert. To cooler. - I 20 cm l o - 10 cm I 1 Scale. ... A. - 0. -10. T ("C). -20. -30. 100. Source. E D B, n C D.
  19. Multiple coexisting states of liquid rope coiling

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/heh/Paper194.pdf
    17 May 2006: 20. The curves for solutions S3 and S4 are identical to within the. ... Liquid rope coiling 291. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 7 8 9 10.
  20. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.039

    www.itg.cam.ac.uk/people/grae/62.pdf
    26 Apr 2006: and 4190, respectively. The corresponding values for ice were taken as 2.20 and 4190. ... Fig. 9. The heat loss factor against radius for the case k = 0.20 with1600 particles (40 40).
  21. 1 Jun 2006: 50. 40. 30. 20. 10. R m. 0. I I I I I I? ... E = 0.0125. 5 10 15 20 25 30 a. a FIQLJRE 8.

Refine your results

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.