Search

13 Dec 2018: ξ(Kn F. ′n Kn1 F′n1). (19). (20). Note that the difference scheme at the end-points is accurate only to first order inξ, and.

22 Jan 2018: Q2 n1=2? L. 1=2x1=2G1=20 ð1 " q1=2Þhpl! 2þ G0. 2pl. " #2; (44). ... 20=ð2plÞ. 2 þ F2ah2=ðplÞ2. G20=ð2plÞ2 þ F2e h2=ðplÞ. 2! 1=2" 1; (47).

13 Dec 2018: around =7, and 20 mm in the TE case. (Thelarger gure was taken for TE in order to ensure easily measurable eld e ects.). ... For TE, the left-hand section was 20 and the right was 10; in the case ofTM incidence the left was taken to be 60 and the right 30

13 Dec 2018: efficiency, and in the perturbation regime allows derivation of analyt-ical results [17–20]. ... R. Soc. Lond.A 446 (1994) 1-20. [12] K.S. Sum & J.

13 Dec 2018: function appear explicitly (namely, Eqs. (14) and. (20)). In principle, the distribution and autocorrelation. ... 8d. Note that. g and the time scale (Eq. (20)) are in units of hours.

28 Dec 2018: The value of β was taken from Kang et al. [20], andthe evaporation speed was measured experimentally. ... σ. 2. (b) (c). 0. 1. 2. 3x104(a). 0 10 20 30k.

16 Jul 2018: Received: 6 March 2018. Accepted: 20 June 2018. Published: xx xx xxxx. ... I. Swimming of flagellated microorganisms. Biophys. J. 16, 151–170 (1976). 20.

13 Dec 2018: allows derivation of analytical results [17–20]. ... 20. M. Spivack, Solution of the inverse scattering problem for grazing incidence upon a rough surface,J.

19 Oct 2018: 20). Vz <1. D. X‘m. ð1Þmþ1a‘þ1;m2‘þ3. (. ‘þmþ12‘þ1 m‘;m. ... The detailedexpressions are omitted here. Since only indices m = 2, 0, 2have non-zero coefficients, we find from eqn (19), (20) and (22),(23) that the x, y components of V

19 Jul 2018: 9]. 4. From Sparling–Tod to Eguchi–Hanson. The holomorphic Sparling–Tod metric [20, 21]. ... Math. Phys. 16 (1975) 2395–2402.20. G. A. Sparling and K. P.