Search

30 May 2006: 24-2. 372 H. E. Huppert and 144. E. Stern. $1. , //,/,////,//////////////,,,/,////// / ///,/I/ // / / / , // , / , / // , / / / / // / /, /' I -. FIGURE 1. An elevation of the channel, bounded by vertical walls at. ... Moh(x/L) e--ikg. (3.24). While in

24 Apr 2014: 24/. 14. F. or p. erso. nal u. se o. nly. ... n 04. /24/. 14. F. or p. erso. nal u. se o.

26 Apr 2006: Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 24 September 2004; accepted 11 November 2004. ... ykumar and Mao [24] again assuming the interface was sharp. The SPH method, as mentioned earlier, does.

27 Apr 2006: 2.18), which can be (2.23) and (2.24) more closely.used in (2.22) to show that Segregation is more sensitive to the value of. ... 4.24)mass reduce to and we use this condition together with (4.21)—.

18 Jan 2011: φ̃0(0; λ̄) =. h(0, y)2 dy. (3.24). The solid curve in figure 5 shows the result of substituting the value of φ̃0(0; λ̄)found in this way

26 Apr 2006: 1.0 [24]. The slope of the linethrough data set (h), for silicon carbide particles in a succino-nitrile melt, is! ... Azouni, W. Kalita, M. Yemmou, J. Crystal Growth. 99 (1990) 201.[24] S.

1 Jun 2006: 1 -. f = 16-21 min. 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 T. ... 0 - 1 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 29.5 30.0 30.5.

12 Jun 2006: g. [23,24]). The major difficulties then consist in the formulation of accurate internalboundary conditions and in following the evolution of the interfaces through time. ... 104 This study 19.6 16.2 3.53 0.585 2.24[2] 19.51 16.2 3.53 0.586 2.243[3]

16 Jul 2010: Geophys. Res., 79, 1792-1797, 1974. Gebhart, B., and J. C. Molendorf, A new density relationship for pure and saline water, Deep Sea Res., 24(9), 831-848, 1977. ... Glaciol., 24, 259-271, 1979. Tressler, W. L., and A.M. Ommundsen, Seasonal oceanographic

9 Mar 2004: rNt 0 rN0 24. M. Ungarish, H.E. Huppert / International Journal of Multiphase Flow 25 (1999) 715737 725. ... For this case. the box model yields [rN/rN(0)]max=[8Fr/(3 b)]1/4. (This is by about 24% smaller than for.