Search

9 Aug 2005: " $#%&%'( )! -,.'/1024365798:,"/;.'/48=<>.@?A,B.'/1CED F.'/'G.'/HEIKJMLON'PQR(CPSJTCVUON'W6XV2ZY[[]Y@_. ab5-cd,"FOYeAfgY@_. Wg5h.'iAid,.'FjD /. WE?kD9BF,"id5FbEDlB6.m@.Dn7l.@c-7l,Vc:op.'/A5/ko:qr5s4BMtbihtF5quBm:FQltvbiw2,"/Ax42ya".@q12y.a'2sAzrD

9 Aug 2005: Department of EngineeringUniversity of Cambridge! " $#%&' ( ) " ,%-.) / 0 213. George Francis HarpurQueens’ College. February 1997. A dissertation submitted forthe degree of Doctor of Philosophy. at the University of Cambridge. Summary. The

9 Aug 2005: "! #$$ "%! &'(&)&! , -.,0/21"35456187 ,:9,0+<;5= >@?@A 4 7B ,:C,'D663EAGF&HI,0J61LK35A. $! NM O#$PRQ M 0S'T 6UWVL6KX'681YZ5Z[. ] 35KXG1L?FW4_6P<AG?ba_681dce?bVgfhA 4_?@A 6861L?@A 4(iP68U03E1LVLK68AjVkl1"m KU? @A 45VL;_A T VL1"6868V] 3EKX 1"?FW456 ]

10 Jan 2005: Nelson and D. H. Pretorius. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound inMedicine and Biology, 24(9):1243–1270, 1998. ... Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(4–5):705–713, February 2003. [13] G. Treece, R. Prager, and Gee.

9 Aug 2005: "#$ %&(') , -./0 %. 13243265879 :<;=79 >?4@2AB2C DE7GF;HD. I=JLKNMPORQTSVU<WPQXKNWY?OZ8[]_Ra 7b9dc7DVegfHhbhi. 53;Hj7Dlknmo;H9k(p-qsr9 Ftu9 ;<;HDltu9 Fv 9 txw;HDlyEtxkle,pGqs1X7bm=zDVt{>Fb;1X7bm=zDVt{>Fb;81X|}LfHC. r9 Fu79 >. fb2X4N5 v 1! #"%$'&)($-,

9 Aug 2005: " $#&%' (),%). -! " #&. / (. 0/ 12 %3&45. 687:9<;>=@?BA.CEDEDECGF HJI=7KCML,;NK;OCG7KCEPOQ(RSFTDEDVUWXF H$Y<;OCM9[ZT=<U<7:ZDGF 7:9]. I =_KP>=H$Y[=;aTb b@cdKefhg-iEe,jkglfhgmfhg-glnoqprfsiGitjVuvlw@xzyOw@{glfEuTj|xk}ifEw@{vlw@xiEe,jmuTjG@xOjOj-wtvzmwy

9 Aug 2005: D@'n61Y/%$1]x y{L4. $/$< /h12% -,. $<h/% ##"e6J9 1 p D$qx y}L:t 1> $<J% -,@ 91Y'Y /lB# (8 Q$<-DF R X;(24 4fL

9 Aug 2005: E 7373 1 :-771 K|83:- 1 ;X3 1 %{! &( :%L -L 71 P&7<( L4 1 )@'e %2L"1 5L,1 2 G>KL [%24<R[VL 7tWA7C4L&4LT % H @ f

9 Aug 2005: T 9:7c7Hu<G?A@ (. -3/24 <WU87;FH8t T <nc7[>3? T 9Z7[c7Hu<:?>MHX6 5 -6/27 5<WU87H87 T 9:>M}8H87< Z S 9VSBZ"7;Fl8Uu<G?

9 Aug 2005: 3. / 6Lf#%&dY 6P4: = "#c+'/ S 24:%&$". /48./ < "4:$+%R4:N "% c# '4:! %&

9 Aug 2005: "!#$%'&(),.-0/21 3 45/6 6 387. 9:;=<=>?9@A<,BDC%@E0@E99#@E,@FG 9H<#IJBDC>LKE#M8 9)N=OE>?:F0@E <PB @QA<==99<. R>LKE#M8 9ST3U/VW XEY. ZU[]_[aa[;b[aNcedUfhgjilk2i;]dinmho pbi;qpgj[rkst[NuNilvvcwaxzy{o|h}rced{k2[NdiEppiEp! "#%$'&( $! )

16 Mar 2005: H. Berman. Engineering a freehand 3Dultrasound system. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(4–5):757–777, 2003. ... Ultrasoundin Medicine and Biology, 24(9):1243–1270, 1998. [22] R. W. Prager, A.

9 Aug 2005: UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGEDEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING! "$#&%'(()! ,-%./0%12 ,3%4"56/. 7&8:9<;>=?A@>B=DCFE 8HGIG. JLK)MON>PRQTS UVXWHWYK)ZXK. JOV[]KS._K)bacedfagXgXg.

9 Aug 2005: 21 1=E5ooYtJ9>. u;%' vw 4# j02 1 v x! $0. 24# 2!

9 Aug 2005: "$#&%(' )#,(#,-/. 021435.76. 8:9<;>=@?BADC5?BEFEHGJIGLKNMOA(9HPBGQ;@R@9S=UTV?WXCZYL[(;@9F]NIGLKYLA(]. CZYL[(;9<]NIG_MA(9HPGJ;@Ra9H=bTdceANIB9<ANGJGQ;@9FANIfGQghYi;>=[VGjAB=jk.

9 Aug 2005: " #$&%(' )! &-, /! 102345 6'7%( )893:; -)&93 8<=>3? @( 0. A9B(C:DFE6GIHJA-B(C:DE6GLKM. NOB&P"E6GRQ8S(SUT. VXWZY[]_W=aWcbed;fIWghji h4fIkel7mnYoW=bqpri i s8tndYUhmvuewhh[Lkxyh[l{zb|WfIW!lb. {) Z " F$/ 34' 0 5 6() <$)&F& <! $&!<c'n35)& < 6%U! 6 (8<c@!

8 Aug 2005: 01. 20. 24. 2.5. 2. 1.5. 1. 0.5. 0. 0.5. 1. ... In Proc. IEEE European Conference onComputer Vision, pages 3–19, 2002. [24] G.

9 Aug 2005: "!$#&%('),-!'0/1243--2. 576$8:9<;>=@?BA$CED F<=HG$CI;>JK=HLNMPOQFBAR=@F<CICI;>=@FBATS CIU"6V;KLK8TCWF.LX ;>Y<8TU"=@FBA$L[ZRF]L[;>CICIL56$8_9";>=@?BA$C_57acbId7e. OQFBARf@6$F<?

9 Aug 2005: For testing we chose the coreset. It consists of 192 utterances from 24 different speakers not in-cluded in the training set. ... JASA, 24:175–184, 1952. [11] Tony Robinson. Dynamic Error Propogation Networks.PhD thesis, Cambridge University

9 Aug 2005: One wayto make a fair comparison is to compare the “merged” SLPMsystem with a system that has 24 Gaussians per state. ... However,data sparseness causes the 24 Gaussians-per-state system to beover trained and its WER on the test set is 39.7% which is