Search

4 Oct 2020: 198. 199. 4.2 Effect of ligament height 200. The effect of ligament height 𝑏 upon the bolt force 𝐹 versus bolt displacement 𝑢 201. ... Mech. Phys. Solids 70, 200–226. 345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.017 346. Camanho, P., Matthews, F

14 Aug 2023: Systèmes). For both indenter geometries, axisymmetric elastic. simulations were performed on a particle of diameter 10 μm,and of Young’s modulus of 200 GPa and Poisson ratio of 0.3;. ... the NMC secondary particles with C65 and binder. The slurry was

22 Aug 2019: 13 At least 200 cells were analysed from multiple micrographs per foamed sample. ... cell size of the low wM nanofoams (of size 200 nm to 350 nm).

31 Jan 2006: 101. 102. 103. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600. Ref. ... The corresponding quasi-static tensile response is characterized by an initialyield stress of 200 MPa, followed by nearly linear hardening, with a tangent modulus of 2 GPa (Zok et al.,2004).

11 Feb 2022: 200%). The value of 200%. was chosen to resemble the equivalent plastic strain in most severely strained elements in Set 4. ... plastic strain has reached a critical level of 200%, progressive failure occurs along the shearing.

8 Nov 2004: 0.28 1.92 45 0.230 0.2280.42 3.32 45 0.200 0.1960.63 5.50 45 0.180 0.178. ... 9, and provides the following material properties: Young’s modulusEs = 200 GPa, 0.2% offset yieldstrengthY = 200 MPa and an approximately linear strain hardening response

10 Sep 2006: Jones [18] showed that the tangent modulus ofpolyurethane (at an unspecified strain measure of 0.48) increased by 250% when the strain ratewas increased from 1 to 200 s1. ... 200. 0. 200. 400. 600. 800. 1000. Test 1 : Input (4.4x103 s–1)Test 1 :

1 Mar 2007: lations of side length 200 by 200. Periodic boundary conditions on displace-138. ... R/ of the lattice. For the mesh of size 200 200 it was found that the143.

7 Nov 2008: The. span for all beams tested was 2 200 mmL  , and the width 30mmb . ... Fig. 4. 0. 5. 10. 15. 20. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800.

27 Jul 2009: 200 I. Pane et al. / European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 28 (2009) 195–201.