Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
1 - 20 of 468 search results for TALK:ZA31 24 / |u:mi.eng.cam.ac.uk where 0 match all words and 468 match some words.
  1. Results that match 1 of 2 words

  2. 20 Feb 2018: Trial # users average # calls median # callsAMT 140 6.5 2Cambridge 17 24.4 20. ... vol. 24, no. 2, pp.150–174, 2010. [7] Amazon, “Amazon Mechanical Turk,” 2011.
  3. PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/UKSpeech2017/posters/e_tsunoo.pdf
    3 Jul 2018: 24,000 fishermen a year. Mostly in storms. And not every country keeps accurate records.
  4. 4 Nov 2018: 23] L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine learning,24(2):123–140, 1996. [24] O. Siohan, B. ... IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech,and Language Processing, 24(8):1438–1449, 2016. Introduction. Graphemic English systems.
  5. Simplifying very deep convolutional neural network architectures for…

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/UKSpeech2017/posters/j_rownicka.pdf
    3 Jul 2018: training set of Aurora4. Model A B C D AVGDNN/clntr 2.71 43.00 24.06 58.66 45.48VDCNN-max-4FC/clntr 2.32 35.99 21.20 ... 24, no. 12, pp. 2263-2276, Dec. 2016. Contact: j.m.rownicka@sms.ed.ac.uk.
  6. 20 Feb 2018: error rate of 33.2 %, and for the first and secondorder derivatives the error rates of the classifiers are 33.1 %and 24.2 %, respectively. ... 24.8 42.4par 22.7 13.1 21.7 32.4 32.7 25.2 27.4 45.1.
  7. 15 Jun 2018: Sig-nificant WER improvements were observed after interpolatingwith the n-gram LM for n-best rescoring – a common practicefor speech recognition [8, 24, 25]. ... 24] S. Kombrink, T. Mikolov, M. Karafiát, and L. Burget, “Recurrentneural network
  8. ICSLPDataCollection-10

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/wiyo04b.pdf
    20 Feb 2018: Per-turn. WER. Per-dialog WER. None 2 6 24 83 % 0 % 0 % Low 4 12 48 83 % 32 % 28 % Med 4 12 48 77 % 46 % 41 % Hi 2 6 24 ... Dataset. Metrics (task & user sat). R2 Significant predictors. ALL User-S 52 % 1.03 Task ALL User-C 60 % 5.29 Task – 1.54
  9. Template.dvi

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~ar527/chen_asru2017.pdf
    15 Jun 2018: LM rescoredev eval. Vit CN Vit CNng4 - 23.8 23.5 24.2 23.9. ... LM #succ words dev evalng4 23.8 24.2. uni-rnn - 21.7 22.1.
  10. The Effect of Cognitive Load on a Statistical Dialogue ...

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~sjy/papers/gtht12.pdf
    20 Feb 2018: Computer Speech and Language,24(4):562–588. O Tsimhoni, D Smith, and P Green. ... Computer Speech andLanguage, 24(2):150–174.
  11. paper.dvi

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~ar527/ragni_is2018a.pdf
    15 Jun 2018: The stage onesystem used an HTK [24] configuration that had been previ-ously employed for all Babel tasks [25, 26], multi-genre En-glish broadcast transcription [27] and many others. ... 25, no. 3, pp. 373–377, 2017. [24] S. J. Young, G.
  12. 20 Feb 2018: wwpos 24.52 11.29 18.47wspos 11.33 4.91 3.31wpof s 1.13 4.82 8.82wppof s 24.27 6.49 10.54wonset 15.08 0.33 ... 47.3% 52.7%. 75.3% 24.7%. Figure 3: Categorical quality ratings for spectral conversion duration conversion HMM-based contour generation.
  13. 15 Jun 2018: In [24] phonetic pronunciation features consisting ofa set of phone-pair distances were proposed for vowels and ap-plied to read speech. ... 8, no. 4, pp. 369–394, 1994. [24] N. Minematsu, S. Asakawa, and K.
  14. 20 Feb 2018: The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 00:0, 1–24. c 2006, Cambridge University PressDOI: 10.1017/S000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom.
  15. 15 Jun 2018: Word levelconfidence scores are returned from the Kaldi [24] decoderwhich are frame weighted and undergo a piece-wise mappingfor use in error detection. ... 3660–3664. [24] D. Povey et al., “The Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit,” in Proc.of the
  16. 20 Feb 2018: 3.3. The agenda-based simulated user. The agenda-based user simulator [24, 25] factorises the user stateinto an agenda and a goal. ... 23] TopTable, “TopTable,” 2012, https://www.toptable.com. [24] J Schatzmann, Statistical User and Error Modelling
  17. ./plot_entropy.eps

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~ar527/chen_is2017.pdf
    15 Jun 2018: 24,no. 8, pp. 1438–1449, 2016.
  18. 20 Feb 2018: In control tests by humanusers, the success rate of the system was 24.5% higher thanthe baseline Lets Go! ... Com-pared to the BASELINE system, the BUDSLETSGO systemimproves the dialogue success rate by 24.5% and the worderror rate by 9.7%.
  19. 20 Feb 2018: 24, no. 4, pp. 562–588, 2010. [13] M Gašić, C Breslin, M Henderson, D Kim, M Szummer,B Thomson, P Tsiakoulis, and S Young, “POMDP-based dia-logue manager adaptation
  20. 20 Feb 2018: SFRName Reward Success #Turnsbest prior 8.66 0.35 85.40 2.19 8.32 0.20adapted 9.62 0.30 89.60 1.90 8.24 0.19. ... The systemwas deployed in a telephone-based set-up, with subjects recruited via Ama-zon MTurk and a recurrent neural network model was used
  21. 20 Feb 2018: The static feature set comprised 24 Mel-Cepstral coefficients,logarithm of F0 and aperiodic energy components in five frequency. ... 12 sentences werethen randomly selected to make up a testset for each listener, leadingto 24 wave files pairs (12 for

Refine your results

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.