Search

24. 2. effdxdy)y,x(F. dxdy)y,x(FA. = (4). where F(x,y) is the modal intensity distribution. ... 12. 14. 16. 18. 20. 22. 24. 26. 28. band. wid.

drops,” Liq. Crys.24, 117–125 (1998).8. A. Ferńandez-Nieves, D. R. Link, D. ... Similarly, the micromirror surface is treated with a surfactant [24] to produce homeotropicLC alignment.

Lett. 10, 1787–1792 (2010). 24. I.M. Pryce, K. Aydin, Y. A. ... ble electronics [22], flexible plasmonics [23] and flexible metamaterials [24]. By using a PDMS.

B. Wright, Opt. Lett.24, 1305 (1999).[5] W. Chen, H. J. Maris, Z.

Faraday DiscussionsCite this: DOI: 10.1039/c9fd00027e. PAPER. Publ. ishe. d on. 24. ... n 4/. 24/2. 019. 1:35. :53. PM. View Article Online. 10 F.

4c during “creepingflow” 23,24. Assuming a parabolic flow profile, estimated strains atthe onset of crystal melting yield point, Region B/C tran-sition were essentially constant within error, ranging from60% ... Rheol. 52, 649 2008.24 A. Le Grand and

become deformed by light due to the low cohesive energyof gold [23,24]. ... 24] J. Mertens, A. Demetriadou, R. W. Bowman, F. Benz,M.-E. Kleemann, C.

The QWscontain a single 3-ML barrier of MnSes1 3 3 ML d, threeequispaced single monolayers of MnSes3 3 1 ML d,24 one-eighth ML s24 3 1y8 ML d, ... Figure 1( b) shothe field dependence ofVL and DE in the 24 3 1y8 MLsample at different temperatures.

platinum,24 proving the flexibility of our technique. In our. a School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSO17 1BJ. ... E. Russell, Faraday Discuss., 2005, 132,191–199. 24 M. E. Abdelsalam, S.

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 15 DECEMBER 2000-IIVOLUME 62, NUMBER 24.