Search

Hubbard … [et al.] (eds.). K-66 – An intoduction to human geography; 2nd ed. / ... Watson … [et al.] (eds.). K/a-20 – Energy, society and environment; 2nd ed / D.

29 Sep 2006: 2395-402. 9. Nathke, I., et al., The calcium-binding site of clathrin light chains. ... Science, 1996. 273(5280): p. 1396-9. 63. Watson, P.J., et al., Gamma-COP appendage domain - structure and function.

23 Feb 2024: Blood 122:3787-3797. Ghevaert, C., Herbert, N., Hawkins, L., Grehan, N., Cookson, P., Garner, S.F., Crisp-Hihn, A., Lloyd-Evans, P., Evans, A., Balan, K., et al. ... Blood 116:1528-1538. Ghevaert, C., Rankin, A., Huiskes, E., Porcelijn, L., Javela, K.,

19 Jun 2019: 2. 1 Statistics in Medical Practice. Watson et al (British Medical Journal, 2005) describe a randomised trial of an interventionproviding child safety equipment to prevent injuries to under 5’s. ... Watson et al report an estimated rate ratio of 1.37

eNeuro. 2021 September 20. 0237-21.2021. Richards J, Memba R, Pavel MC, et al. ... Prag HA, Gruszczyk AV, Huang MM, Beach TE, Saeb-Parsy K et al.

16 Jul 2024: There has been an explosion of papers applying diffusion to protein design, and, no-tably, Watson et al. ... Ho et al. [19] defines the noising procedure as:. p(xt | xt1) := N(.

9 Jul 2023: As Aktipis et al (2011) argue, the value of social bonds like osotua is that they contribute to ‘risk-‐pooling’. ... This aids risk mitigation because many of the risks which pastoralists face are indeed diversifiable (see Watson et al 2016).

13 Feb 2024: This was further developed by Mathijssen, et. al. [31],who derived a numerically tractable approximation for the flow field produced by a Stokeslet andhence the flow field produced by a force- ... First discovered by Drescher, et al. in 2009 using the

14 Nov 2013: 8 Matthews et al. Table 6Relative Flux Contributions from the Belt and Halo. ... 2009).The suggestion that the entire HR 8799 system may be. coplanar is consistent with the results of Watson et al.(2011) and Greaves et al.

12 Dec 2023: Watson et al.41 with 4% higher esti-mated peak demand (177GWh) with a larger deviation is observed at20% for the maximum ramp up in heat demand (72GWh vs 60GWh).Compared ... to Sansom et al.24 we derive a significantly lower peakdemand (36%) and almost 45