Search

17 Jan 2022: control. This monopoly is supported through restrictive contracts and cripples innovation in scholarship such as text-mining and data-mining, re-use of factual scientific information and many other necessary actions. ... that interesting developments in

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... PMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style that I have done for Wikipedia.

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. What do these columns mean? (chemical help required). In Quixote we are writing a semantic infrastructure for computational chemistry. That means we have to create precise and consistent annotation for components. The

17 Jan 2022: Perhaps. Scholarship and scientific practice. Scientists will be able to archive their own data, funded by the institution. ... But are universities the best place to put scientific data? Can they all support chemistry, archaeology, astronomy, etc?

17 Jan 2022: On Monday I shall be taking at Colorado State University on the theme on “Digital preservation of the scientific record” – probably not the precise title. ... I got very annoyed at the Glasgow meeting last year on digital scholarship when a smooth

17 Jan 2022: Open-bibliography. This is extremely exciting as well because bibliography is key to our management and navigation of the scientific literature. ... As a result we hope to change the way in which science is published and its outputs are managed.] We see

17 Jan 2022: Two days ago Nature/Macmillan (heareafter “Nature”) announced a new form of “access” (or better “barrier”) to scientific scholarship – “SciShare”. ... In what way does this announce “that Nature makes the rules for the scientific

17 Jan 2022: You have often said the scientific community should "take back our scholarship", but I think the first step is for the scientific community to take responsibility for our scholarship. ... You have often said the scientific community should “take back

17 Jan 2022: NO! It’s a living semantic resource. That because we can interpret it, enhance it and use it as the underpinning of our scholarship. ... And as Wikipedia is Open I can use all of theose for personal enlightenment or scholarship.

17 Jan 2022: I am a chemist at the University of Cambridge with a major research interest in eScience – the UK term for the combination of scientific research and scholarship with the new opportunities ... In chemistry much of the primary scientific information