Search

22 May 2006: 1.4 Inverse of a matrix. 24. 1.4.1 Uniqueness of inverse. 24. ... . (. 1 4 2). =. . . 6 24 124 16 81 4 2.

5 May 2006: Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 24 September 2004; accepted 11 November 2004. ... ykumar and Mao [24] again assuming the interface was sharp. The SPH method, as mentioned earlier, does.

22 May 2006: gyrus (BA 6) 6 24 69 3.9 19Right precentral gyrus (BA 4) 24 24 72 3.6 11Right precuneus (BA 7) 3 33 54 3.7 13Left precuneus (BA 7) ... cuneus (BA 30) 6 57 15 4.7 48Right cuneus (BA 18) 6 87 24 3.7 6.

22 Nov 2006: This sensitivity to outliers is a well known feature of the MMI criterion [24]. ... j))}. (24). Each Gaussian component is assumed to be independent of all others.

19 Apr 2006: Surprisingly, however, the 24 and 70 µm images of Vegaactually have larger radii than the submillimeter ring or mil-limeter clumps (Su et al., 2005). ... Emission (Additional)Vega A0 200 >90 23,24,25 Eridani K2 <1000 60 26,27η Corvi F2 1000 100 28τ

27 Apr 2006: iments havebeenusedin drawing up fig. 3.) Fig.1 • 24.5 5 then plots the heightsof the mushy layer and. ... 0 24 concentrationsas functions of time for experi-0 100 200 300 400 500 mentswith the six different valuesof the contam-.

22 Nov 2006: HMM ML – 29.4 27.3C-Aug ML CML 24.2 –. HMM MMI – 25.3 24.8C-Aug MMI CML 23.4 –. Table 2. Classification error on the TIMIT core test ... A point of particular interest is that despite poorer statesegmentation—the sufficient statistics fix the

14 Jun 2006: Mentalizing X 3 53 24 M 5.29. Harrington, D. L., et al. ... 2004). Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3917–3925 Episodic Retrieval 35 60 14 L 4.25.

23 Jul 2006: MP3. 44100 Hz. 123.64 MB. Date: July 24, 2006. Speakers: Revd Michael Roberts.

21 Dec 2006: q 26%). b, X-ray rapper ensemble (q 24%). c, The published NMR ensemble(q 14%). ... Biochemistry 24, 3831–3841 (1984). 27. Best, R. B., Clarke, J. & Karplus, M.

15 Sep 2006: There is also. [Journal of Petrologf, Vol. 29, P t n 3, pp 599-«24, 1988] Oxford Umvcroty Prcu 19S8. ... FJH,. (24). We determined numerical solutions of (15)—(18) in addition to either (19)—(23) or merely (24).The differences were negligible.

30 May 2006: r 2 ) ( r < 1) 2.94 0.93 1.27 1.00 {(‘i ( r > 1 ). - I Cylindrical Gaussian e-T2 ( f < 00) 3.13 1-12 2.24 0.86. ... If h,R-l > Fmin (2.24) t It is interesting to compare these values with the relationship h0R-l = 2 deduced by.

5 May 2006: We areinterested in cases with small C2H because otherwise the distance of propagation issmall, see (3.24), and no real gravity current appears. ... Using the approximations (3.19)–(3.24), we find: (i) for S < 1.

31 Aug 2006: We deduce from (56), (57), (58), (22) and the first part of (24)that. ... Numer. Anal., 25(2005), pp. 1–24. R.K. Beatson, M.J.D. Powell and A.M.

4 Sep 2006: 1990. 335.87. 80.22. 1990. 5.6. 4.6. 39.9. 24.9. 5.3. 1991. 335.20. ... 81.54. 1991. 5.4. 4.8. 41.7. 24.5. 5.2. 1992. 338.00. 78.85. 4.

7 Aug 2006: The volunteers (mean age = 24.5 years, range 19–35). were screened using a comprehensive medical questionnaire and,. ... Left lateral PFC (BA 45/46) 45 27 24 4.4Anterior cingulate cortex (BA 32) 6 15 51 5.3.

30 May 2006: 24-2. 372 H. E. Huppert and 144. E. Stern. $1. , //,/,////,//////////////,,,/,////// / ///,/I/ // / / / , // , / , / // , / / / / // / /, /' I -. FIGURE 1. An elevation of the channel, bounded by vertical walls at. ... Moh(x/L) e--ikg. (3.24). While in

30 May 2006: a$'(@, SY), DPI = { P } [ 1 , 1 , S&I, (4.23) where yil) = P-1Bi/Ms$2) (4.24 a). ... 4.24 b) = 1 1 8 ) K21og K O ( K 2 ). Truncating a t n = N = 2 , we obtain the second approximation.

5 Jul 2006: Complementary System Selection (“Random”). • Variability to systems can be obtained by varying for example:– segmentation and clustering [3]– acoustic model decision tree [24]– acoustic model context (tri/quin-phone) [4]– ... Cambridge

30 Mar 2006: Examples includequasistatic compression imaging [26, 29], axial shear wave imaging [32] and acoustic radiationforce imaging in both quasistatic/impulsive [24] and dynamic [2] forms. ... We substitute this into Equation 24, and rearrange to produce a