Search

17 May 2006: 4Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, UMR 8550 CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24,rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris cédex 05, France. ... 1. 2. –12. 3. 10. G. I. IG. (ν. /g2 ). 1/3. ̂. H(g/ν2)1/3 Ĥ. ̂ (Ĥ/)10/3Π15/9. Π15/24. Π15/96. Π1–1/6

5 May 2006: c). 100. 300. 500. 700. = 0.0500. g′ = 19.24 cm s–2.

5 May 2006: T = T(c) 5.176 c 13.27 c2 24.16 c3 75.52 c4 (2.1)for 0 < c < 0.7, where T (. C) is the temperature of the freezing ... 1:47, 2:14, 2:22, 2:49, 2:58, 3:24, 3:33, 3:59, 5:16, 5:43, 6:52, 7:46,.

5 May 2006: J. Fluid Mech. (2006), vol. 549, pp. 99–129. c 2006 Cambridge University Pressdoi:10.1017/S0022112005007500 Printed in the United Kingdom. 99. Numerical modelling of convection ina reactive porous medium with a mobile. mush–liquid interface. By

5 May 2006: www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/lab/digiflow/ 2005.23 G. S. Campbell, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 57 1990.24 T.

30 May 2006: r 2 ) ( r < 1) 2.94 0.93 1.27 1.00 {(‘i ( r > 1 ). - I Cylindrical Gaussian e-T2 ( f < 00) 3.13 1-12 2.24 0.86. ... If h,R-l > Fmin (2.24) t It is interesting to compare these values with the relationship h0R-l = 2 deduced by.

5 May 2006: 14 24.4 8.5 380 015 25.2 17.1 276 016 26.2 34.1 204 017 25.9 63.2 171 018 103.3 8.3 90 019 ... 164 2.913 25.6 33.3 0.123 510 2.930 24.6 16.8 0.123 270 2.931 50 16.8 0.123 240 2.932 104.1

5 May 2006: Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 24 September 2004; accepted 11 November 2004. ... ykumar and Mao [24] again assuming the interface was sharp. The SPH method, as mentioned earlier, does.

5 Jan 2006: The experimentswere generally left to run for 24 hours, but heat loss to the laboratory became asignificant factor after roughly 10 hours. ... dy. dτ= (1 θ). (1 y)(1 Λθ). (3.24). y(τ = 0) = 1, (3.25).

5 May 2006: We areinterested in cases with small C2H because otherwise the distance of propagation issmall, see (3.24), and no real gravity current appears. ... Using the approximations (3.19)–(3.24), we find: (i) for S < 1.