Search

19 Oct 2002: 09 -0.35 0.36 1 -3.1 -2.6 21.59 1 20.97 1 19.80 1 19.18 1 18.64 1 2 135 86 7 100.0 ... 0.4 22.02 -2 21.66 1 20.24 1 19.56 1 18.83 1 3 141 116 3 58.3 0.3016 16.3539 -45.77 0.5

28 Mar 2002: 0.694.52. A399/401. 127. 2001-08-30. Y. -1.0. -4.3. 20.1. 0. 22.3. 0. ... 0.853.08. A 1837. 200. 2001-02-22. Y. -1.7. -1.8. 20.7. 0. 22.6.

28 Mar 2002: 19 -0.23 0.48 1 1.6 -0.2 0.00 0 0.00 0 20.75 -2 20.91 -2 0.00 0 2 572 8 7 2657.3 ... 2.5 8.3 0.61 0.14 -0.75 0.22 0.58 0.35 -0.69 4.52 1 -1.0 -4.3 20.13 0 22.29 0

28 Mar 2002: 0.9911.02. Cl0939472. 167. 2001-08-14. Y. 1.9. -1.2. 0.0. 0. 20.5. -1. ... 0.690.10. B2 112831. 175. 2001-03-12. Y. 1.4. -1.7. 0.0. 0. 20.2.

12 Oct 2002: Weclose this section by looking at the heat and wave operator in the context ofTheorem 4.20. ... The proof of Lemma 5.20 (i) involves substantial calculation. Lemma 5.21 (Lemma 5.3).

28 Mar 2002: 4.1 7.1 1.00 0.58 -0.13 0.06 -0.33 0.08 -0.65 0.28 1 -0.7 -1.2 20.40 0 22.25 0 ... 0.07 8.28 1 -2.2 -1.3 19.57 0 21.42 1 20.82 -2 21.72 -2 20.22 -2.

18 Oct 2002: 0.840.10. IRAS22491-18. 267. 2001-07-04. Y. 0.4. -2.2. 20.4. 1. 20.0. 1. ... 0.700.11. NGC7010. 255. 2001-12-10. Y. -0.3. 3.8. 0.0. 0. 20.8. 1.

28 Mar 2002: 0.2 0.00 0 0.00 0 20.75 -2 20.91 -2 0.00 0 3 134 79 7 96.0 0.3004 16.5737 -45.55 0.6 ... 0.59 0.20 1 -0.1 0.1 0.00 0 21.84 1 21.24 1 21.39 1 0.00 0 6 448 74 7 108.1

31 Jan 2002: Knowledge compensates for Lack of Search. Expertise comes in chunks of 70,000 20,000!

28 Mar 2002: 0.324.32. SDS-1. 119. 2001-05-06. Y. 2.9. -1.6. 20.5. -2. 23.1. -1. ... 0.853.08. A 1837. 200. 2001-02-22. Y. -1.7. -1.8. 20.7. 0. 22.6.

19 Oct 2002: 1.6 0.00 0 0.00 0 22.20 1 19.94 1 19.65 1 3 1661 73 3 378.7 21.0719 -11.4569 -34.64 1.4 ... 4 0.00 0 22.80 1 21.31 1 20.50 1 19.87 1.

19 Oct 2002: 0.330.88. Mrk 1014. 117. 2001-04-24. Y. -0.9. 1.8. 20.3. -3. 20.8. ... 0.700.11. NGC7010. 255. 2001-12-10. Y. -0.3. 3.8. 0.0. 0. 20.8. 1.

19 Oct 2002: 2.2 20.45 1 20.02 1 18.87 1 17.95 1 17.81 -3 3 1593 13 7 219.9 8.8093 34.8562 38.15 2.9 ... 22.27 -2 21.50 -1 21.53 -1 4 744 11 7 197.0 1.9909 0.2156 -58.14 3.2 2.3 -1.1 0.20 0.08

20 Mar 2002: 7. 428.0. 1h4m28.00s. -6d15m40.6s. -68.90. 20.4. 1.4. 0.55. 0.31. 0.38. 0.09. ... 5. 57.1. 2h19m20.13s. -4d54m31.5s. -59.46. 4.6. 0.3. -0.02. 0.34. 0.35. 0.20.

26 Dec 2002: 2597 23 25 31.23 -12 5 12.0 redo redo redo bad ZPT 2 extd target NGC 7770 23 51 33.15 20 7 47.0 S1.4 S1.2 ... 22.68 20 38 6.0 do S2.1 S2.1 new field 1 bt?

19 Oct 2002: 0.320.12. G158-100. 90. 2001-09-20. Y. -2.1. -0.0. 0.0. 0. 0.0. 0. ... 0.700.11. NGC7010. 255. 2001-12-10. Y. -0.3. 3.8. 0.0. 0. 20.8. 1.

27 May 2002: Optical magnitue limit 20 mag for each band. Optical magnitue limit 19 mag for each band.

19 Oct 2002: 02 -0.73 0.02 1 0.4 -1.6 0.00 0 0.00 0 22.20 1 19.94 1 19.65 1 2 2816 9 3 567.6 ... 5 0.00 0 21.77 1 20.91 1 20.24 1 19.95 -3.

19 Oct 2002: 1.391.32. EQ Peg. 107. 2001-04-27. Y. -2.2. -1.3. 20.9. -1. 20.5. ... 0.700.11. NGC7010. 255. 2001-12-10. Y. -0.3. 3.8. 0.0. 0. 20.8. 1.

24 Dec 2002: 25 31.23 -12 5 12.0 redo redo redo bad ZPT 2 extd target NGC 7770 23 51 33.15 20 7 47.0 redo redo redo if seeing ... 1 25 43.20 1 47 37.5 redo bad ZPT 1 HCG 15 2 7 49.01 2 10 18.0 do do do new field 2 SDS-1 2

19 Oct 2002: 1.391.32. EQ Peg. 107. 2001-04-27. Y. -2.2. -1.3. 20.9. -1. 20.5. ... 1.482.13. NGC 7009. 255. 2001-08-10. Y. -1.6. 2.2. 20.8. -1. 20.6.

19 Oct 2002: 1.6 0.00 0 0.00 0 22.20 1 19.94 1 19.65 1 3 1661 73 3 378.7 21.0719 -11.4569 -34.64 1.4 ... 00 0 0.00 0 23.39 -2 20.79 -1 20.27 -2.

19 Oct 2002: 02 -0.73 0.02 1 0.4 -1.6 0.00 0 0.00 0 22.20 1 19.94 1 19.65 1 2 2816 9 3 567.6 ... 21.24 -2 20.12 -3 19.66 -1 4 3068 51 3 157.8 23.5258 20.1409 -38.92 4.7 2.7 -5.5 0.94 0.07

3 Jun 2002: JD 2452440.458 Local Mean Sidereal Time at midnight = 15 20 44.8 Sunset ( 2326 m horizon): 21 19 GDT; Sunrise: 7 05 GDT Evening twilight: 22 45 GDT; LMST at ... 45 GDT Moon at civil midnight: illuminated fraction 0.173 3.1 days before first quarter, RA

3 Jun 2002: JD 2452444.458 Local Mean Sidereal Time at midnight = 15 36 31.0 Sunset ( 2326 m horizon): 21 20 GDT; Sunrise: 7 05 GDT Evening twilight: 22 46 GDT; LMST at ... 20 GDT Moon at civil midnight: illuminated fraction 0.605 0.9 days since first quarter, RA

12 Jul 2002: 126 mm. 20 mm. 9 mm. Fixed. Figure 5.12: Top view of tape spring used in finite element analysis. ... hinge turned through 90 degrees;the set-up can be seen in Figure 5.20.

21 Jun 2002: h,γ) = hsα(γ) and check using (20) that θ+ is a ho-. ... uχ(h+) = (θV (h+),θW (h+))u for all h+ H5. (24). 20.

16 Jan 2002: Profits are. COMPANY 2don’t. COMPANY 1 advertise advertisedon’t advertise (50, 50) (20, 60). ... advertise (60, 20) (27, 27). Note that both companies are better off if they do.

16 Jan 2002: 4 0 2). or. (0 4 20 4 2. ). • The row player knows which matrix it is.• The column player does not. ... 0 4 20 4 2. ). • If the row player tells the column player which matrixit is, the value of the game is clearly 0. •

24 Sep 2002: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35. ... 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350. 0.01. 0.02. 0.03.

3 Jun 2002: evening twilight: 13 48 Morning twilight: 5 39 GDT; LMST at morning twilight: 20 45 12-degr twilight: 22 09 GDT -- 6 13 GDT; night center: 2 11 GDT Moonset : 21

3 Jun 2002: evening twilight: 13 52 Morning twilight: 5 39 GDT; LMST at morning twilight: 20 48 12-degr twilight: 22 09 GDT -- 6 13 GDT; night center: 2 11 GDT Moonset : 22

3 Jun 2002: evening twilight: 13 57 Morning twilight: 5 39 GDT; LMST at morning twilight: 20 52 12-degr twilight: 22 10 GDT -- 6 13 GDT; night center: 2 11 GDT Moonset : 23

3 Jun 2002: evening twilight: 14 01 Morning twilight: 5 39 GDT; LMST at morning twilight: 20 56 12-degr twilight: 22 10 GDT -- 6 13 GDT; night center: 2 12 GDT Moonset : 23

24 Sep 2002: Uθ = 3V/20.313V 30.3924V 5 0.648V 71.24V 9 2.63V 115.96V 13+. ... Pitaevskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 7 (1958) 858;E.P. Gross, Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961) 454.

3 Jun 2002: JD 2452443.458 Local Mean Sidereal Time at midnight = 15 32 34.5 Sunset ( 2326 m horizon): 21 20 GDT; Sunrise: 7 05 GDT Evening twilight: 22 46 GDT; LMST at

24 Sep 2002: Because an electron bubble is made oblate by its motion relativeto the condensate, the critical velocity for the vortex nucleation is reduced byabout 20%, in agreement with experiments. ... of the mainstream. condensate (20), (21) in terms of kM, a0 and

24 Sep 2002: y 20 F F 2 q 30 F 3 q F 2 F q F 2 F y 20 FF F q 40 F 2 Fx x x x x t ... q 10 FF F y 60 F F F q 20 FF 2 q 5F 2 F y 25FF Fx x x x x x x x x x x x

5 Mar 2002: a) (b). (c). -20 -1010 20. -1. -0.5. 0.5. 1. -20 -10 0 10 20. ... 0.5. 1. -20 -10 10 20. -1. -0.5. 0.5. 1. MxMy.

20 Dec 2002: Last modified: Fri Dec 20 10:29:28 2002.

9 Sep 2002: 3. i<j=1,k=1. ijkn1iaiBik. xs1,s3i (t)xs1,s3j (t)y. r1,r3k (t θ̃) dt. (20). ... t|), so (20) can be calculated by integrating the terms from equations (22-24)term-by-term against xsj(τ)x.

20 Aug 2002: compared to sieving by 20-30%, as predicted by theoretical analysis. Measurements of. ... Isotropic compressionand shearing at 20.7 MPa. Isotropic compression to 62.1 MPa.

18 Apr 2002: C12. 36. 0.2 M di-Sodium Tartrate, 20% PEG 3350. D1. 37. ... 40. 0.2 M di-Sodium hydrogen Phosphate, 20% PEG 3350. D5. 41.

14 Jan 2002: Executie31.6 (10.6) 20.7 (13.4)Letter fluency (FAS) 26.9 (16.6) 45.2 (9.9)b. WCST categories (6) NT NT 5.1 (1.4) 6. ... 1.5 (2.6) 10.5 (9.5) 20.5 (5.2) 15.2 (7.4)aRey figure (30 min recall).

24 Sep 2002: sinkrV(r)r dr 12(1 γ)χk2. (20). The bulk normalization condition (18) gives the slope at the origin (the dimensionless speedof sound) as. ... chosen with three requirements in mind: (i) the entire dispersion curve (20) gives a reasonablefit to the

14 Jan 2002: Kinetic analysis of guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis associated with tubulin olymerization. Biochemistry 20, 1918-1924, (1981). ... 20.Erickson, H.P., Taylor, D.W., Taylor, K.A. & Bramhill, D. Bacterial cell division protein FtsZ assembles into.

24 Sep 2002: This gives. "! "! " $#! " (20)where is pressure and the # are the quantum stresses. ... Himbert, N. Pavlov, and J. Treiner: J. Low Temp. Phys. 81, 31 (1990)20.

22 Mar 2002: web”. Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik Motorlurftschiffahrt, Vol. 20,1929. 2Reissner, E., “On tension field theory”, Proc. ... 20, pp. 631–639, 1985. 14Adler, A.L., Mikulas, M.M., and Hedgepeth, J.M., “Staticand dynamic analysis of partially

30 Aug 2002: 15O method.Subjects received a 20 s i.v. bolus of H2. 15O through a forearmcannula at a concentration of 300 Mbq/ml and a flow rateof 10 ml/min before ... Cogn Neuropsychol 18,. 125–231 (2001). 20. Tyler LK, Moss HE, Durrant-Peatfield MR et al.

1 Jul 2002: The solution to this is tosmooth equation 20 with a separate language model trainedon a large amount of well-formed data. ... Equation 20 then becomesuy ) ACBEDFAHGz y! = M«y (22)where « controls the weight placed on grammatical well-formedness.