Search

12 Jan 2004: the Deputy Prime Minister 17,841 1Qualifications and Curriculum Authority 14,749 1Royal Society 3,983,738 213Teaching Company Directorate 173,127 9Others (under £6,000) 2,284 8. ... 698 1London School of Economics 6,924 1Loughborough University 30,135

22 Apr 2004: Quantitative economics. Economics Tripos, Part I, 2004 – ECT1The examination will take place in the Sidgwick Avenue Lecture-rooms. ... Quantitative methods in economics. Economics Tripos Part IIA, 2004 – ECT2The examination will take place in the

5 Dec 2004: The question is currently of considerable technological importance for communication networks, while in various other forms it has a long history in the fields of physics and economics. ... It provides a concrete, measurable example of an economic

15 Mar 2004: 9. MANAGEMENT STUDIES TRIPOS DIPLOMA IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES. Thursday 2 May 2002 9 to 12.00 _____________________________________________________________________ Paper M3 ECONOMICS AND FINANCE Answer not more than four questions, two from Section A

1 Mar 2004: AnthropologyAHA Architecture and History. of ArtBiol BiologyCl ClassicsDiv DivinityEduc EducationEngg EngineeringEngl EnglishEP Economics and Politics. ... Geography (d) Dr K. Patel, J, Prof. S. J. Young, EM.Economics and Politics (c) Mr R.

22 Jan 2004: Economics and PoliticsEconomics and Politics 18 6 34 9 57 40 109 55 16 5 26 9 47 31 89 45.

23 Aug 2004: Economics 32 8 40 — — —M.Phil. Economics with Development 6 3 9 — — —M.Phil. ... Economics with Finance 5 4 9 — — —M.Phil. Education 4 43 47 — — —M.Phil.

20 Jul 2004: 1. AAACCCMMMBBBSSS MMMCCCAAAPPPCCC IV. ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF STRUCTURES WITH FRP REINFORCEMENT AND PRESTRESS. ... In this paper methods to study the economics of those materials are presented and conclusions on their viability in bridges are drawn.

14 May 2004: The ‘Leslie Stephen Lecture’ is given in every other academic year, and honours Sir Leslie Stephen (1832-1903), the British philosopher and man of letters who

12 Jul 2004: America Alone’ outlines the costs of the neo-conservative push in terms of economic damage, distortion of priorities, rising anti-Americanism, encroachment on civil liberties, domestic political polarisation and reduced security.