Search

16 Jan 2003: Afteran initial scan, the centrifuge was over-speeded at 24,000 rev/min for 6 h, to reduce the time taken to reach equilibrium (Van Holde and Baldwin, 1958),and then ... the speed was reduced and another scan was taken, followed by further scans at

10 Sep 2003: Newton Inst. 8 131–148.[15] V. Ginzburg, A charge in a magnetic field: Arnold’s problems 1981-9, 1982-24, 1984-4, 1994-14,. ... de Mat.IMPA. Rio de Janeiro, 1991. [24] R. Mañé, Lagrangian flows: the dynamics of globally minimizing orbits,

18 Dec 2003: Results were obtained by re-scoring of 4-gramlattices. Feature Transform Swbd1 Swbd2 Cellular Total— 24.2 40.8 40.4 35.1. ... The resulting 4-gram LM is further interpolated with a class-based trigram languagemodel where the classes are automatically

9 Oct 2003: An Investigation into the Interactions betweenSpeaker Diarisation Systems andAutomatic Speech Transcription. †S.E. Tranter, †K. Yu, ‡D.A. Reynolds, †G. Evermann,†D.Y. Kim & †P.C. WoodlandCUED/F-INFENG/TR-464. 9th October 2003. †

2 May 2003: 23 TFORM23 = '1E ' / data format of field: 4-byte REAL TUNIT23 = 'RADIANS ' / physical unit of field TTYPE24 = 'DEC ' / label for field 24 TFORM24 = '1E ' / data format of field: 4-byte REAL ... midtime of observation STSTART = ' 6:23:24.9' / Local

24 Jul 2003: Slide 24 of 25. Click slide for next, or gotoslides or back to thumbnail layout.

11 Sep 2003: Methods and Applications,ActaCrystallogr. D49, 24-36. 6. Buckle, A. M., Henrick, K., and Fersht, A. ... 20. Kraulis, P. (1991)J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950.21. Laitinen, P. J., Brown, K.

10 Jan 2003: 14; Jan. 24; Feb. 27 (a.m.);. Mar. 17 (a.m.)MR R. J. ... DR J. W. FAWCETTNeural Development (Three lectures, 11, 17, 24 Feb.) L.T.

24 Sep 2003: JONES AND OTHERSThe same continued. DR D. J. TOLHURSTHomeostatic Control. (Five lectures, 15–24. ... Parasitic Diseases: Malaria; Key Examples ofParasitic Diseases: Schistosomiasis. (Three lectures,beginning 24 Nov.).

14 Feb 2003: θm = νσrE. (24). Wrinkles will form when the geometric hoop strainis larger than the material strain, hence from Equa-tions 8, 22, 23 and 24, we obtain. ... t (mm) Eq. 37 (mm) Exp. (mm) FE (mm). 0.025 24.7 25.4 22.30.050 41.5 33.9 35.6.