Search

17 May 2002: 24 2.3.3 Direct simulation of unsteady transition. 28 2.3.4 Comments on unsteady transition.

24 Jan 2002: f̃(ω) =. dt f(t)eiωt ; f(t) =1. 2π. dω f̃(ω)eiωt (24). ... G(x,t) = dωdk. (2π2). ei(kxωt). ρω2 iγω Tk2(29). A. (24 January 2002) (TURN OVER.

12 Sep 2002: 1985), 24-41. [CGW] F. Chung, R. L. Graham and R. M.

2 Feb 2002: 3.1 Hidden mode models for HMM’s 24. v. vi. 3.2 Subband and Multi-Stream based models 26.

24 Sep 2002: 2 (24). Nonlinear Schrödinger equation 5. At best, this describes the phonon branch of the excitation spectrum. ... e.g. see [34]. It is clear from (24) that is negligibly small when , because then!

31 Oct 2002: The equilibrium bond length for this case differs by 3.34% from CASTEP, as compared to -1.24% for the.

9 Sep 2002: Soc. Brasil. Mat. 9 (1978). 83–87.[24] G. P. Scott, ‘A new proof of the annulus and torus theorems’, Amer.

20 Aug 2002: CUED D/SOILS/TR321 White 2002 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________. 24. sample after each addition of fine material revealed that an evolution of a ‘tail’ in the.

12 Sep 2002: A A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 33, 35, 46, 52, 58}.

31 Oct 2002: In the same way, the calculation of the total energy gradient with respect to the NGWF expansion coefficients of equation (24) can be calculated in the FFT box provided we use ... Therefore all we have to do is to substitute. of equation (24) by.