Search

11 Jul 2000: Bibliography. S. Goedecker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 1085. 2. J. H. Wilkinson, The algebraic eigenvalue problem (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1965). B. N. Parlett, The symmetric eigenvalue problem (Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980). G. H.

11 Jul 2000: We use an LDA [24] for the exchange and correlation term. ... We have performed another calculation with. updated according to the highest kinetic energy of all approximate eigenvectors, which converges to 24 eV.

11 Jul 2000: where. (24). where. is. from the previous iteration. We give the expression for.

7 Jan 2000: Turnbull, eds., Solid State Physics Vol. 24 (Academic Press, New York, 1970) 1-36.

2 Mar 2000: 10 23.21 20.48 18.31 15.9911 24.73 21.92 19.68 17.2812 26.22 23.34 21.03 18.5513 27.69 24.74 22.36 ... 59 24.7718 34.81 31.53 28.87 25.9919 36.19 32.85 30.14 27.2020 37.57 34.17 31.41 28.4130 50.89 46.98

30 Mar 2000: This covers so many factors of 10 (24 from top to bottom of the chart) that the axis would be very cluttered if they were all marked.

8 Nov 2000: 2.8 Multi Blade Row Prediction Methods 21. 2.9 Three Dimensional Blade Design 24.

10 Aug 2000: High speed beam testing using an electron-optical phase shift element. Electronics Letters 24: No: 23, 1441-2.

27 Jun 2000: has been in use for 24 years.

17 Nov 2000: 20. 3.4 Mass Estimates. 22. 3.5 Discussion. 22. 4 Deployable Reflector 24. ... 24. (Miura and Miyazaki 1990), in which the triangulated net was supported by six telescopic.

13 Sep 2000: dh = r sin ΦX ΓXY (24). dv = r (1 cos ΦX ) ΓXZ (25).

25 Sep 2000: 4.8 Mode shapes of 10 m diameter re ector with 24 ribs. ... 24. 3.2. SIMPLE MEMBRANE STRUCTURE. Table 3.5: Natural frequencies of simple structure.

28 Mar 2000: a2 b c = 0 (24). can be solved and, of the two solutions, the one closest ton1 is chosen. ... 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 3435.

8 Feb 2000: 24. L2. h2B. 2(15). and. v =h 2. 24. L2. h2 B. ... u v = 2. h 2. 24. L. h. 2(19). u2 v2 =. h 2. 24. 2 L. h. 4B2 2. 4(20). Substituting back into Equation 18, ignoring higherorder terms, and

11 Jan 2000: J. Mech. Sci., 24, 219-230 (1982). 57. C.R. Calladine, 'Modal stiffnesses of a pre-tensioned cable net', Int. ... 110. C.R. Calladine, "Some paradoxical experiments on beams". International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 24, 37-48 (1996).

20 Mar 2000: The Storchen Bridge in Wintherthur,Switzerland, with a total length of 124 m has two of its 24 cables madefrom carbon fibres [18]. ... 23] HAY, J. Response of Bridges to Wind.HMSO, London, 1992. [24] SHEARD P.

29 Feb 2000: Assistant Director of Research, University of Cambridge, U.K. First presented at the Bridge Surveyor Conference, 24. ... A2. P. test. (kN). 29.2. 28.3. 27.9. 19.0. 23.4. 23.5. 24.1.

5 Oct 2000: Lattices were generated on the training set using a bigramLM. The bigram 1-best hypotheses had a 24.6% word error rate(WER) and a Lattice WER (LWER) of 6.2%.

10 May 2000: ID BASE BRF UBRF3k 22.2 24.4 33.37k 33.8 37.5 44.3. 14k 41.4 47.6 51.827k 43.0 49.7 53.855k 43.5

17 Oct 2000: 704/c 26.3 15.570a/b 10.3 1.970f/d 18.8 7.670w/c 24.2 15.8. Table 1: Lattice error rates for several development test speakerswith ... a fg 14.24 —HMM-2 thresh. b fg 13.81 —HMM-2 thresh. c fg 13.71 6.68.

10 Apr 2000: M S TM 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81. ... 1F3 36.4 32.7 35.3 33.9F4 28.6 25.0 25.4 24.4F5 28.6 23.8 27.1 26.5FX 58.5 55.2 56.8

8 Mar 2000: Y 14.2 8.0 15.4 20.3 16.5 14.0 16.6 24.6. ... ROVER fgintcat 4/Y1/N 13.8 7.8 15.1 20.1 15.8 13.6 16.6 24.1.

8 Mar 2000: 36.5F4 24.2 25.1 23.1 21.3F5 25.7 24.1 25.9 23.0FX 57.2 53.7 57.1 50.4. ... 24.1 29.9ROVER BN2/3/gd ic 1/4 15.8 9.4 15.2 19.5 26.9 19.4 22.1 29.1.

8 Mar 2000: Test Data Adaptation ClassesSubset None Global MultipleNM/FB 26.7 24.8 22.3BM/FB 41.2 32.8 31.3NM/RB 58.5 40.7 36.5Overall 36.4 ... HMM-2/1 trans fg 27.2 18.8 26.4 32.6 24.1 29.6 21.1 48.2HMM-2/2 trans fg 26.9 18.7 26.2

6 Nov 2000: Some discriminative training schemes, such as frame-discrimination [14, 24], try to over-generate training set con-fusions to improve generalisation. ... In [24] it was shownthat the improvements obtained by FD were at least as goodas those reported by

26 Apr 2000: Althoughvolume graphics (the storage and display of volumetric data as opposed to polygonal surfaces)has advanced considerably over the last decade [14, 24], most surfaces are still defined aspolygonal models, and ... the skeleton representation [2]and

12 May 2000: There are several techniques which can successfully generate this voxelarray from single sweeps [24]. ... Figure 1(a), forinstance, shows two sweeps from a liver examination which have been interpolated using thevoxel nearest neighbour [24] interpolation.

8 Mar 2000: 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 0 5 10 15 20 25. ... Comparing Table 4 with Table 3the advantage of including two passes can clearly be seen: onBNeval98 the error rate was reduced by 24% while the overallcomputation was increased by about a

31 Jul 2000: 0885–2308/00/020137 24 $35.00/0 c 2000 Academic Press. 138 M. Saraçlaret al.

2 Nov 2000: 1003 250 - 225.85 192.66 224.24 187.371003 250 158.98 151.15 158.68 149.371003 500 - 230.96 193.86 228.93 188.111003 500 159.77

1 Jun 2000: 36. 23. 35. 24. 34. 25. 33. 26. 32. 27. 31. ... 19. 3. 20. 2. 21. 1. 2223. 36. 24. 35. 25.

10 Apr 2000: Theoverall system gave a WER of 24.8% which corre-sponded to a Processed Term Error Rate [11] (whichmore closely represents the error rate as seen by theretriever) of 32.1%.

10 Apr 2000: an Average Precision (AveP) of 55.88 obtained on referencetranscriptions, 55.08 on our own transcriptions (24.8% WER)and 44.15 on transcriptions from DERA [17] (61.5% WER) onthe ... high 39.97% 0.24% 54.65% 1.54%Slide low 59.41% 0.17% 68.35% 1.38%L=10s

8 Mar 2000: This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on. the TREC-6 test data. ... 1 77.3 17.5 5.2 5.9 28.6HTK-2 80.8 14.6 4.6 4.9 24.1.

10 Apr 2000: Corr Ins Sub Del WERROBERT VITO 166 19 56 8 36%RON HOFSTETTER 27 4 48 22 76%BUFFALO TIGER 14 3 18 2 67%FX 188 24 115 32 50% ... 24 Files Required for Processing. ;;;; more comments about the format/condition categories;;a960523 1 Ted_Koppel 399.063

10 Apr 2000: SPI Post RS NRS NS #Dup AveP R-PY B 96.0 39.39 27.42 752913 - -N B 95.8 37.52 24.92 698461 - -Y A 78.3 ... InProc. TREC-7, NIST SP 500-242, pages 1–24, Gaithersburg, MD. Introduction. Description of Task and Data.

10 Apr 2000: 39.77Condition Match(%) 54.19 17.24 19.70 21.18 25.12 11.82 24.63 42.86 41.38Total Match(%) 58.12 1.88 2.50 2.50 ... 45 35.96 39.90 49.75 53.20 53.20 29.06 27.09 53.69Total Match(%) 20.00 24.38 25.00 56.25 58.12 51.25

8 Mar 2000: This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on the TREC-6 test data and ran in about 50 times real time. ... Recogniser WER stop map stemIBM Baseline 50.0 47.5 47.2 44.3Sheffield 39.8 37.6 37.1 34.6HTK-1 28.6 24.9 24.7

19 Apr 2000: Of the 110 seconds worth of “news” rejected by the sys-tem with shorter windows, 24 seconds was due to an inter-view with Bill Clinton being re-broadcast, and the

8 Mar 2000: M S T. M 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81.

25 Oct 2000: Figure 2: Resultsfrom the existing SpaceCarving algorithm using different thresholdsettings. The voxel array size was , and the thresholdswere 48,32,24,16(of 255)respectively. ... Figure 4: Resultsfrom the existing SpaceCarving algorithm using different

25 Oct 2000: 7] M.A. FischlerandR.C.Bolles.Randomsampleconsensus:A paradigmfor modelfitting with applicationsto imageanalysisandautomatedcartography. CACM, 24(6):381–395,June1981. [8] R.I.

5 Oct 2000: The bigram 1-best hypotheses had a 24.6% word error rate (WER) and a Lattice WER (LWER) of 6.2%...

14 Aug 2000: ID. BASE. BRF. UBRF. 3k. 22.2. 24.4. 33.3. 7k. 33.8. 37.5.

1 Mar 2000: 24.4. F5. 28.6. 23.8. 27.1. 26.5. FX. 58.5. 55.2. 56.8. 55.0. ... 39.6. 25.1. 37.2. F4. 24.1. 24.7. 24.5. 22.6. F5. 27.6. 25.8.

2 Mar 2000: F5. 24.4. 23.8. 21.4. 20.0. FX. 32.7. 32.7. 30.9. 30.9. Overall. ... 19.1. 17.2. 24.7. 30.9. P3. bg. 1/N. 19.1. 11.9. 20.4. 27.6.

1 Mar 2000: 24.6. F5. 28.6. 23.8. 27.1. 24.8. FX. 58.5. 55.2. 56.8. 55.4. ... 25.3. 29.0. 24.3. 28.1. F2. 38.3. 41.6. 35.7. 37.3. F3. 25.3.

1 Mar 2000: Comparing Table 4 with Table 3 the advantage of including two passes can clearly be seen: on BNeval98 the error rate was reduced by 24% while the overall computation was increased

2 Nov 2000: 225.85. 192.66. 224.24. 187.37. 1003. 250. 158.98. 151.15. 158.68. 149.37.

8 Mar 2000: HTK. ATT. Dragon. Base1. Sheff. Base2. DERA. WER. 24.8. 31.0. 29.8.