Search

1 Jun 2000: 36. 23. 35. 24. 34. 25. 33. 26. 32. 27. 31. ... 19. 3. 20. 2. 21. 1. 2223. 36. 24. 35. 25.

10 Apr 2000: Theoverall system gave a WER of 24.8% which corre-sponded to a Processed Term Error Rate [11] (whichmore closely represents the error rate as seen by theretriever) of 32.1%.

10 Apr 2000: an Average Precision (AveP) of 55.88 obtained on referencetranscriptions, 55.08 on our own transcriptions (24.8% WER)and 44.15 on transcriptions from DERA [17] (61.5% WER) onthe ... high 39.97% 0.24% 54.65% 1.54%Slide low 59.41% 0.17% 68.35% 1.38%L=10s

8 Mar 2000: This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on. the TREC-6 test data. ... 1 77.3 17.5 5.2 5.9 28.6HTK-2 80.8 14.6 4.6 4.9 24.1.

10 Apr 2000: Corr Ins Sub Del WERROBERT VITO 166 19 56 8 36%RON HOFSTETTER 27 4 48 22 76%BUFFALO TIGER 14 3 18 2 67%FX 188 24 115 32 50% ... 24 Files Required for Processing. ;;;; more comments about the format/condition categories;;a960523 1 Ted_Koppel 399.063

10 Apr 2000: SPI Post RS NRS NS #Dup AveP R-PY B 96.0 39.39 27.42 752913 - -N B 95.8 37.52 24.92 698461 - -Y A 78.3 ... InProc. TREC-7, NIST SP 500-242, pages 1–24, Gaithersburg, MD. Introduction. Description of Task and Data.

10 Apr 2000: 39.77Condition Match(%) 54.19 17.24 19.70 21.18 25.12 11.82 24.63 42.86 41.38Total Match(%) 58.12 1.88 2.50 2.50 ... 45 35.96 39.90 49.75 53.20 53.20 29.06 27.09 53.69Total Match(%) 20.00 24.38 25.00 56.25 58.12 51.25

8 Mar 2000: This system gave a word error rate of 24.1% on the TREC-6 test data and ran in about 50 times real time. ... Recogniser WER stop map stemIBM Baseline 50.0 47.5 47.2 44.3Sheffield 39.8 37.6 37.1 34.6HTK-1 28.6 24.9 24.7

19 Apr 2000: Of the 110 seconds worth of “news” rejected by the sys-tem with shorter windows, 24 seconds was due to an inter-view with Bill Clinton being re-broadcast, and the

8 Mar 2000: M S T. M 82.11 17.89 0.00N 15.27 84.22 0.51S 0.56 98.24 1.20T 0.00 1.19 98.81.