Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
1 - 10 of 48 search results for TALK:Vb20 24 / |u:mi.eng.cam.ac.uk where 0 match all words and 48 match some words.
  1. Results that match 1 of 2 words

  2. 5 Jun 2006: 233.2.4 State-Based Speech Enhancement. 24. 3.3 Model-Based Techniques. 243.3.1 Linear Regression Adaptation. ... Ljm(τ ) = p(qjm(τ )|YT , M) (2.24)=. 1L(YT |M) Uj (τ )cjmbjm(y(τ ))βj (τ ). where. Uj (τ ) =. . a1j , if τ = 1N1i=2.
  3. 22 Nov 2006: The set of parameters,Θ(sm),. 1Using this form of auxiliary function yields the same update formulae asusing the extended Baum-Welch (EBW) algorithm [24], [25]. ... Wmpem =B2D. 2m B1Dm B0β. (c)m Dm. (23). where. B2 = Σ̂m (24).
  4. 22 Nov 2006: ãtj = max{atj , amin} (24). whereãtj is the floored scale factor andamin is the scale floor.In this paper,amin of 0.1 was used.
  5. article.dvi

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~mjfg/rosti_CSL04.pdf
    22 Nov 2006: Factor analysed hidden Markov models for. speech recognition. A-V.I. Rosti , M.J.F. Gales. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Trumpington Street, Cambridge,. CB2 1PZ, UK. Abstract. Recently various techniques to improve the correlation
  6. 5 Jul 2006: Complementary System Selection (“Random”). • Variability to systems can be obtained by varying for example:– segmentation and clustering [3]– acoustic model decision tree [24]– acoustic model context (tri/quin-phone) [4]– ... Cambridge
  7. 22 Nov 2006: ComponentsGMM A-GMM. EER(%) minDCF EER(%) minDCF. 128 12.17 0.5014 8.62 0.3714256 11.24 0.4704 7.88 0.3467512 11.13 0.4638 7.48
  8. IEEE TRANS. ON SAP, VOL. ?, NO. ??, ????? ...

    mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~mjfg/liu_ASL07.pdf
    22 Nov 2006: This sensitivity to outliers is a well known feature of the MMI criterion [24]. ... j))}. (24). Each Gaussian component is assumed to be independent of all others.
  9. 19 Dec 2006: Uncertainty 1 4 16 256. Clean — 33.2. SPLICENo. 24.6 20.7 17.0 12.3FE-CMLLR 16.3 15.3 12.8 13.5.
  10. 22 Nov 2006: Km(Oi, Oj ; λ(1)) (24)where Kl(Oi, Oj ; λ) is the dot-product of the log-likelihoodratios and Kc(Oi, Oj ; λ(1)), Km(Oi, Oj ; λ(1)), etc., ... than in the ML case. This is because the MMI base-line performs much better than the ML baseline
  11. 22 Nov 2006: HMM ML – 29.4 27.3C-Aug ML CML 24.2 –. HMM MMI – 25.3 24.8C-Aug MMI CML 23.4 –. Table 2. Classification error on the TIMIT core test ... A point of particular interest is that despite poorer statesegmentation—the sufficient statistics fix the

Refine your results

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.