Search

Initially, expenditure was slow which allowed the Open Access Team to maintain a healthy balance that could guarantee funding for almost any paper which met a few basic requirements.

All of this requires close reading and interpretation of funder requirements to ensure that we are able to support our researchers in what they are required to as well as what

Initially, expenditure was slow which allowed the Open Access Team to maintain a healthy balance that could guarantee funding for almost any paper which met a few basic requirements. ... Individuals depositing their outputs in a subject repository are

In the blog HEFCE identified the key issues in meeting OA requirements as:. ... The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement.

The Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP) lists 80 funders with open access requirements, and the list continues to grow.

their funder requirements by uploading their manuscripts to our institutional repository, Apollo, without needing to apply an embargo. ... in the first year of the Wellcome Trust rights retention requirement in the absence of an institutional policy.

The decision was to support APCs for postgraduate researchers (PGRs) who did not have any other access to money for gold open access, and could only be spent on fully open ... They noted that this was a welcome opportunity to be able to offer something

Helpfully, the policy document makes no mention of this requirement; rather, this feature of the policy appears in the accompanying FAQs. ... The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement.

Before the meeting, I encouraged the mentee to compile a list of funders, and their funder’s data sharing requirements.

Helpfully, the policy document makes no mention of this requirement; rather, this feature of the policy appears in the accompanying FAQs. ... The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement.

bring requirements for US researchers more closely in line with what many of our researchers already need to do as a result of e.g.

If your current system is just not up to requirements, switching to a new one can be a good time investment in the long run, but it can come with its

that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point. ... The updated HEFCE policy has addressed this:. “… we have decided to introduce an exception to the deposit requirements for outputs

The review mentioned visits to institutions and noted how long it takes for researchers to learn about open access including the requirements, expectations and processes they need to follow.

a surge in retractions all stem from the requirement that researchers publish in high impact journals. ... The guidelines for reviewers and authors are here, including the requirement to “upload their raw data and laboratory log to a free and publicly

a surge in retractions all stem from the requirement that researchers publish in high impact journals. ... The guidelines for reviewers and authors are here, including the requirement to “upload their raw data and laboratory log to a free and publicly

For current theses, this permission can be incorporated into the submission process, either as part of the requirement for the PhD or by the author signing an agreement when the thesis

We are hoping that we might be able to work with RLUK and funding councils to come to an agreed set of requirements that we can have endorsed by the community

While these might seem like lofty and even admirable goals, it does not mean that the academic response to being informed of their grant requirement for sharing data have been met ... Who owns the data? This is an interesting question. EPSRC policies

If your current system is just not up to requirements, switching to a new one can be a good time investment in the long run, but it can come with its

In all cases, the license applied should fulfil the requirements defined by the Berlin declaration. ... The requirement for an open license is also potentially an issue for some disciplines.

The Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP) lists 80 funders with open access requirements, and the list continues to grow.

requirements. But getting researchers to visit www.openaccess.cam.ac.uk and engage with the service is proving to be a challenge.

Understanding the requirement to provide, data, information or knowledge, to better support a decision-making team. ... Before the meeting, I encouraged the mentee to compile a list of funders, and their funder’s data sharing requirements.

As Jessica Gardner discussed on this blog, our collective ambition is to negotiate a Read-and-Publish deal with Elsevier that meets the sector’s requirements on costs and open access. ... If an editorial board is by its own admission prepared to make

The team is now trying to answer how theses fit into the Open Access research landscape, the potential impact of making theses available online, fulfilment of funder requirements.

In order to do this we have had to learn more in depth about open access requirements and Research Councils’ funder requirements. ... This has involved researching and interpreting the REF 2021 requirements for open access to disseminate effectively to

Targeting our training. RDM workshops seem to be the most common way research data teams are engaging with researchers, typically targeting postgraduate research students and postdoctoral researchers.

Hence, specific OA requirements pertaining to UK-based authors will be considered in setting OA policy but will probably not be a determining factor. ... Hence, if strict requirements are introduced around OA in relation to UK funders, this may serve to

While all research is potentially affected by the HEFCE requirement to make work available, the route preferred is through placing a copy in a repository. ... Academic freedom. The discussion several times touched on the broader issue of the government

This way, they will fulfil their funder requirement without having to pay a penny. ... As Jessica Gardner discussed on this blog, our collective ambition is to negotiate a Read-and-Publish deal with Elsevier that meets the sector’s requirements on

So far we have managed to speak to 764 researchers about data sharing requirements (the numbers continue to grow). ... Many Cambridge researchers have raised questions about sharing data from collaborations – with concern that non-UK partners who do

However, doing nothing is no longer a valid option. If hybrid publishers are unable to commit to the Wellcome Trust’s set of requirements and do not significantly improve the quality

There needs to be a sense of equity if we were to introduce new requirements.

Repositories, preprint servers – what’s the difference? Firstly, this policy legitimises preprint servers (likeand many more) and allows authors to use these systems without needing to worry about technical requirements. ... Individuals depositing

While all research is potentially affected by the HEFCE requirement to make work available, the route preferred is through placing a copy in a repository. ... Academic freedom. The discussion several times touched on the broader issue of the government

This is partly explained by the University of Cambridge’s requirement for PhD students to upload their theses from 1. ... with their funder requirements.

The advocacy for RDM at Cambridge started as ‘Open Data’ requirements, which led many researchers to believe that RDM is yet another requirement to comply with and that it was only ... requirements for research data management and sharing as a

bring requirements for US researchers more closely in line with what many of our researchers already need to do as a result of e.g.

As Jessica Gardner discussed on this blog, our collective ambition is to negotiate a Read-and-Publish deal with Elsevier that meets the sector’s requirements on costs and open access. ... meet our requirements.

In light of the growing requirements for open access publications, there should be better financial provisions to support researchers from universities and funding bodies.

The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement. ... We are scoping the technical requirements for automating these processes. A new requirement at Cambridge for the deposit of digital theses means there will be three

Appreciated that we were walked through the process and implications of funding requirements”.

So far we have managed to speak to 764 researchers about data sharing requirements (the numbers continue to grow). ... Many Cambridge researchers have raised questions about sharing data from collaborations – with concern that non-UK partners who do

Meeting these requirements is a major task for the University, and one it has tried to make as simple as possible for researchers. ... that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point.

This way, they will fulfil their funder requirement without having to pay a penny.

their funder requirements by uploading their manuscripts to our institutional repository, Apollo, without needing to apply an embargo. ... in the first year of the Wellcome Trust rights retention requirement in the absence of an institutional policy.

associated costs and resourcing requirements, both in terms of service management and infrastructure (long-term access, storage, and preservation costs).

Initially, expenditure was slow which allowed the Open Access Team to maintain a healthy balance that could guarantee funding for almost any paper which met a few basic requirements. ... meet requirements of REF 2021 open access policy and the post by

requirements. But getting researchers to visit www.openaccess.cam.ac.uk and engage with the service is proving to be a challenge.