Search

The policy gives researchers a route to make the accepted version of their papers open access without embargo under a licence of their choosing (subject to funder requirements). ... when a journal moves unexpectedly out of a read and publish agreement or

These two dates are important since we rely on them to set the correct embargoes and assess compliance with open access requirements. ... s timeframe requirements, but other open access compliance issues, especially when you set embargoes.

In addition, they were strongly against any Open Research requirements being tied in with HR practices like promotions. ... The researchers supported discipline specific requirements for Open Research. Clearer instructions from the University and from

So far we have managed to speak to 764 researchers about data sharing requirements (the numbers continue to grow). ... Many Cambridge researchers have raised questions about sharing data from collaborations – with concern that non-UK partners who do

Hence, specific OA requirements pertaining to UK-based authors will be considered in setting OA policy but will probably not be a determining factor. ... Hence, if strict requirements are introduced around OA in relation to UK funders, this may serve to

CTS is a self-assessment status for repositories, awarded based on meeting 16 requirements that reflect the characteristics of trustworthy repositories. ... research outputs for the long-term, but also to meet funder requirements which are increasingly

Apollo forms an important part of the University’s provision for meeting research funder requirements for open access, enabling ‘Green’ access to publications. ... decade. Over that time, Apollo has participated in a number of externally funded

Initially, expenditure was slow which allowed the Open Access Team to maintain a healthy balance that could guarantee funding for almost any paper which met a few basic requirements. ... Before the meeting, I encouraged the mentee to compile a list of

requirements for research data management and sharing as a condition of their grants. ... There was the observation that the requirement for library qualification is moving from ‘essential’ to ‘desirable’ in job advertisements, and some are just

So a further question arises: can/should a rights assignment for the period after the author’s death also be included or considered a requirement of the publishing contract in these

One list attempting to collect the declarations and position statements on Open Research from around the world has over 90 entries. ... But this is easier said than done. While making underlying data available has been a requirement of some publishers

This refers to the requirement to develop skills and provision of specialised researcher training. ... Any requirement to use specialised software or obscure data manipulations should be avoided wherever possible.

Despite the challenges that apply to authors (such as funder requirements, national mandates, or differentials of income), there is a clear advantage of publishing open access.

Quick win: minimum requirements for making shared data useful. A requirement that, as a minimum, three key elements should be made available with publications – the raw data, the source code and ... One easy solution is to nudge researchers towards

While these might seem like lofty and even admirable goals, it does not mean that the academic response to being informed of their grant requirement for sharing data have been met ... Who owns the data? This is an interesting question. EPSRC policies

that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point. ... The updated HEFCE policy has addressed this:. “… we have decided to introduce an exception to the deposit requirements for outputs

Helpfully, the policy document makes no mention of this requirement; rather, this feature of the policy appears in the accompanying FAQs. ... The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement.

We are scoping the technical requirements for automating these processes. A new requirement at Cambridge for the deposit of digital theses means there will be three different processes because requests for

While all research is potentially affected by the HEFCE requirement to make work available, the route preferred is through placing a copy in a repository. ... Academic freedom. The discussion several times touched on the broader issue of the government

Due to overarching funders’ and government’s requirements for Open Access to publications, many researchers started perceiving Open Access to publications merely as a necessary compliance condition. ... The advocacy for RDM at Cambridge started as

that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point. ... The updated HEFCE policy has addressed this:. “… we have decided to introduce an exception to the deposit requirements for outputs

For current theses, this permission can be incorporated into the submission process, either as part of the requirement for the PhD or by the author signing an agreement when the thesis ... In fact, it was only at this point that I began dating my diary

use. In this context, CRUK is actively working to increase and improve data sharing by being instructive but not necessarily demanding in its requirements. ... Range of requirements across different journals/publishers. Need to take care not to kill

This update brings the policy frameworkinalignmentwith funder requirements and acknowledgesthe important roles that Principal Investigators,research staff and students, and University support staff play in good data management practices.It sits

If an editorial board is by its own admission prepared to make arbitrary decisions about what they will publish based on people’s location and their policy requirements rather than the ... Once the data access committee has considered that the

Summaries of and links to funder requirements for research data sharing . ... Concurrently we have been conducting tailored information sessions about funders’ requirements for sharing data and support available at the University of Cambridge.

a surge in retractions all stem from the requirement that researchers publish in high impact journals. ... The guidelines for reviewers and authors are here, including the requirement to “upload their raw data and laboratory log to a free and publicly

Appreciated that we were walked through the process and implications of funding requirements”. ... A committee was formed to identify the requirements of three disparate groups: IT and records management, legal and IP, and researchers.

To do this, select an appropriate repository, adhere to any ethical/legal requirements, follow discipline-specific standards and make your data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). ... Some of this work involved disambiguating publisher

Qualifications outside LIS. A small number of respondents do not hold qualifications in LIS but hold or are working towards postgraduate qualifications in other subjects. ... This was a larger percentage than those who had studied LIS at either

Daureen outlined a number of requirements for an ELN in a University:. ... A committee was formed to identify the requirements of three disparate groups: IT and records management, legal and IP, and researchers.

that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point. ... The updated HEFCE policy has addressed this:. “… we have decided to introduce an exception to the deposit requirements for outputs

Meeting these requirements is a major task for the University, and one it has tried to make as simple as possible for researchers. ... to do to comply with funder requirements, eligibility for any funding body grants, and handle depositing the article

associated costs and resourcing requirements, both in terms of service management and infrastructure (long-term access, storage, and preservation costs).

As Jessica Gardner discussed on this blog, our collective ambition is to negotiate a Read-and-Publish deal with Elsevier that meets the sector’s requirements on costs and open access. ... meet our requirements.

The EPSRC started checking compliance with their data sharing requirement on 1 May 2015. ... In May 2015 we invited Ben Ryan to come to the University to talk about the EPSRC expectations on data management and how Cambridge meets these requirements.

In all cases, the license applied should fulfil the requirements defined by the Berlin declaration. ... The requirement for an open license is also potentially an issue for some disciplines.

so they can concurrently meet HEFCE requirements and also ensure that the public profile of their institution’s research is protected? ... This is clearly not possible given that our staff time is already spent checking and complying with the myriad of

This way, they will fulfil their funder requirement without having to pay a penny. ... As a consequence, the authors in each case decided to submit to an alternative journal so that they could comply with their funder requirements.

. Unlocking Research. Open Research at Cambridge.. Menu. Search for:. Open Research in the Humanities: public engagement. Authors: Emma Gilby, Matthias Ammon, Rachel Leow and Sam Moore. This is the fifth of a series of blog posts, presenting the

when a journal moves unexpectedly out of a read and publish agreement or a publisher does not offer any publishing route that meets their funder requirements. ... bring requirements for US researchers more closely in line with what many of our

While these might seem like lofty and even admirable goals, it does not mean that the academic response to being informed of their grant requirement for sharing data have been met ... Who owns the data? This is an interesting question. EPSRC policies

funder requirements. ... Looking ahead. There are some large projects underway in 2018. We are consulting with our research community and continuing to refine the thesis requirement policy.

Meeting these requirements is a major task for the University, and one it has tried to make as simple as possible for researchers. ... to do to comply with funder requirements, eligibility for any funding body grants, and handle depositing the article

This way, they will fulfil their funder requirement without having to pay a penny.

The team is now trying to answer how theses fit into the Open Access research landscape, the potential impact of making theses available online, fulfilment of funder requirements.

In addition, they were strongly against any Open Research requirements being tied in with HR practices like promotions. ... The researchers supported discipline specific requirements for Open Research. Clearer instructions from the University and from

associated costs and resourcing requirements, both in terms of service management and infrastructure (long-term access, storage, and preservation costs).

This replaced our long-standing policy on data management and sharing – extending our requirements for research data to also cover original software and materials (such as antibodies, cell lines and reagents). ... Further, while it not appropriate to

Not much new here. The Funders will ensure the establishment of robust criteria and requirements for the services that compliant high quality Open Access platforms and journals must provide. ... Indeed, there is a precedent. In 2017 the Wellcome Trust