Search

Apollo forms an important part of the University’s provision for meeting research funder requirements for open access, enabling ‘Green’ access to publications. ... decade. Over that time, Apollo has participated in a number of externally funded

Meeting these requirements is a major task for the University, and one it has tried to make as simple as possible for researchers. ... to do to comply with funder requirements, eligibility for any funding body grants, and handle depositing the article

These two dates are important since we rely on them to set the correct embargoes and assess compliance with open access requirements. ... s timeframe requirements, but other open access compliance issues, especially when you set embargoes.

The policy gives researchers a route to make the accepted version of their papers open access without embargo under a licence of their choosing (subject to funder requirements). ... when a journal moves unexpectedly out of a read and publish agreement or

In addition, they were strongly against any Open Research requirements being tied in with HR practices like promotions. ... The researchers supported discipline specific requirements for Open Research. Clearer instructions from the University and from

So far we have managed to speak to 764 researchers about data sharing requirements (the numbers continue to grow). ... Many Cambridge researchers have raised questions about sharing data from collaborations – with concern that non-UK partners who do

Hence, specific OA requirements pertaining to UK-based authors will be considered in setting OA policy but will probably not be a determining factor. ... Hence, if strict requirements are introduced around OA in relation to UK funders, this may serve to

CTS is a self-assessment status for repositories, awarded based on meeting 16 requirements that reflect the characteristics of trustworthy repositories. ... research outputs for the long-term, but also to meet funder requirements which are increasingly

Apollo forms an important part of the University’s provision for meeting research funder requirements for open access, enabling ‘Green’ access to publications. ... decade. Over that time, Apollo has participated in a number of externally funded

Initially, expenditure was slow which allowed the Open Access Team to maintain a healthy balance that could guarantee funding for almost any paper which met a few basic requirements. ... Before the meeting, I encouraged the mentee to compile a list of

requirements for research data management and sharing as a condition of their grants. ... There was the observation that the requirement for library qualification is moving from ‘essential’ to ‘desirable’ in job advertisements, and some are just

So a further question arises: can/should a rights assignment for the period after the author’s death also be included or considered a requirement of the publishing contract in these

This refers to the requirement to develop skills and provision of specialised researcher training. ... Any requirement to use specialised software or obscure data manipulations should be avoided wherever possible.

One list attempting to collect the declarations and position statements on Open Research from around the world has over 90 entries. ... But this is easier said than done. While making underlying data available has been a requirement of some publishers

Despite the challenges that apply to authors (such as funder requirements, national mandates, or differentials of income), there is a clear advantage of publishing open access.

While these might seem like lofty and even admirable goals, it does not mean that the academic response to being informed of their grant requirement for sharing data have been met ... Who owns the data? This is an interesting question. EPSRC policies

Quick win: minimum requirements for making shared data useful. A requirement that, as a minimum, three key elements should be made available with publications – the raw data, the source code and ... One easy solution is to nudge researchers towards

that their chosen repository meets the requirements set out in this policy.” And this is the crunch point. ... The updated HEFCE policy has addressed this:. “… we have decided to introduce an exception to the deposit requirements for outputs

Helpfully, the policy document makes no mention of this requirement; rather, this feature of the policy appears in the accompanying FAQs. ... The most challenging part of the COAF policy is the Europe PMC deposit requirement.

We are scoping the technical requirements for automating these processes. A new requirement at Cambridge for the deposit of digital theses means there will be three different processes because requests for