Search

27 Aug 2008: The derivation! B Promotion! B! B;! B; C Contraction!B; C Cut!; Cis reduced to3 The exceptions are the cases where (L) is the (second) rule above the cut. ... B! B;! B; C Cut!;! B; C Cut!;! ; C Contraction!; Cor to the symmetric one where we cut against

19 Aug 2008: L(A, B) L′(A′, B′) - L(A B′, B B′) L′(A A′, A B′). ... L(A A′, B A′) L′(B A′, B B′)? comp- L(A A′, B B′).

21 Aug 2008: This easily reduces to(x)(x(b):b(d):chd i j! x(a00):a00h 2i). 1. 2. 3. ... c. d. e. f. (((, ), )),Figure 5: Trace of G.which is to(x)(x(b):b(d):ch di j x(a00):a00h 2i j!

18 Aug 2008: A; W-L ; ;B W-R ; A;A; A; C-L ; ;B;B ;B C-R :Naturalities implicit in proof nets in tandem with our reduction principle for logicalcuts suggest a ... A B A A B BA;B A BA _ A;B;B A B;A BA _ A;B A B (3).

8 Mar 2008: Our first step is to obtain the missing part (iii)b of Lemma 9.3.

21 Aug 2008: p = cod: B B).The first case is of interest in the context of Classical Domain Theory, while the second one istypical of SDT. ... Example 1.12 Given a quasi-topos B, let p = cod: B B (and CI = B/I), then:. •

22 Jan 2008: fixBgf = g.fixCf(Ag). • (Diagonal)For f : AB B B. fixB(fixBf) = fixBB(B.f). ... When f : A B B we show the variables by writing f(a,b).

21 Aug 2008: p = cod: B B).The first case is of interest in the context of Classical Domain Theory, while the second one istypical of SDT. ... Example 1.12 Given a quasi-topos B, let p = cod: B B (and CI = B/I), then:. •

28 Aug 2008: RA¥Tr¥T@U $µU U$¡$¢$ª R$TT¡b3rU [ U U$¡$7U$7¥T9¥qµ¢ZN$9µ9¡bTT¡b¡b=[Ð<;Ò7¥T$ª«Z¥T&¡b=Ñ5¥N$ &¡Ä$ r$N¡ @7$9] 7 @R7 rHU7. ... j7 ;U'(jPj$Ê5ª Ê 1F] &Å)¡$$Uª2¡$7$@? ¡bµ$¡b ¡b ¡$@T! $j¡$'U¥ÂT ¡b.ª #))º.

28 Aug 2008: RA¥Tr¥T@U $µU U$¡$¢$ª R$TT¡b3rU [ U U$¡$7U$7¥T9¥qµ¢ZN$9µ9¡bTT¡b¡b=[Ð<;Ò7¥T$ª«Z¥T&¡b=Ñ5¥N$ &¡Ä$ r$N¡ @7$9] 7 @R7 rHU7. ... j7 ;U'(jPj$Ê5ª Ê 1F] &Å)¡$$Uª2¡$7$@? ¡bµ$¡b ¡b ¡$@T! $j¡$'U¥ÂT ¡b.ª #))º.