Search

8 Mar 2000: For speech transcription problems with widely varying speaker, channel and background conditions, such as broadcast news transcription, it is beneficial to include unsupervised test-data adaptation to individual speakers and data ... The inter-node costs

10 Oct 2001: We thus present the conclusions we draw from our new SDR tests as general, respectably-based findings for our set of test collections. ... attempted to complete BU tests for the range of devices considered for BK.

23 Feb 2002: to the query before running the standard BRF technique on the test collection. ... The query expansion was performed on the union of the test and the parallel text collections.

31 Mar 2005: NIST,. ''Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT),''.

13 Jul 2004: NIST,. Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT).

2 Nov 2000: The full HUB-4 1997 evaluation test set was used to assess language model performance. ... Treating this as the baseline result to improve upon, statistical significance was tested by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at a 5% significance level..

30 Mar 2000: This contains the TREC-8 SDR test collection period (Feb 1st to June 30th 1998). ... For development, the 100 hours of TREC-7 SDR test data was used.

20 Feb 2018: Objective evaluation. In order to test the performance of the different repair systems,. ... T - O 0.66 0.20 0.14. Table 8: Preference test results.

2 Mar 2000: During system development the BNeval97 test set was used. 4.1 Increased Acoustic Training Data. ... All these sources excluded data from the designated test epochs. This corpus was denoted LMtrain98.

14 Jun 2004: This was to simulate conditions in the RT-03s evaluation, where there was a temporal gap between the test-audio and the training shows. ... To help minimise the cost of computing the BIC statistics at every point, a faster Hotelling's T test is first

20 Feb 2018: class-based trigram 4.8 3.4. Table 1. Test results for the speech recognizer (%WER). ... Forthe NL test, the semantic parser used as input the reference tran-scriptions instead of the recognized output.

20 Feb 2018: For the test material 30 sentences from a tourist information en-quiry application were used. ... JVF IVF. Fig. 2. Comparison between CF-IVF and CF-JVF on a forced choicepreference test.

20 Feb 2018: Figure 6: Results of the ABX test. between each source and target speaker pair. ... perc. enta. ge. PSHM. JEAS. MM MF FM FF. PSHMJEAS. Figure 7: Results of the quality comparison test.

20 Feb 2018: 5. Perceptual EvaluationA direct comparison between F0 conversion methods was facil-itated using a three-way preference test. ... The same test was then conducted using converted neutralutterances generated by our conversion system.

19 Jun 2023: Feedback 140. Speech Processing. 21. Free speaking prompt-response tests – speak for up to 1 minute. ... INTERSPEECH 2020. • S. McKnight et al, “Automatic Assessment of Conversational Speaking Tests”, UK Speech C.

7 Oct 2001: The final HTK system designed from the results of these experiments yielded an overall word error rate of 22.0% on the 1996 unpartitioned broadcast news development test data and just ... but if the (small) test collection is used, then average precision

1 Jan 2024: The relevant properties can be established by taking soil samples on site andperforming a series of tests, thus enabling engineers to design safely.

20 Feb 2018: 0.85. 0.9. 0.95. Speech to Noise Ratio SNR (NOV93 Test Set). ... For all tests, a set of 1017 Communi-cator test utterances was used.

8 Mar 2019: Business Language Testing Service (BULATS) Spoken Tests. • Example of a test of communication skills A. ... NICT Japanese Learner English (JLE) • Manual transcription of interviews from English oral proficiency test. •

13 Jun 2013: Part of theretransmitted data was held-out to form a test set, dev1. ... Foreach of the channels there was 2 to 2.5 hours test data, de-pending on how much of the retransmitting speech passedquality assurance tests.