Search

3 Apr 2017: Participants were told to try to learn the appearance ofthe objects on the background as best as they could in prepar-ation for a memory test on the object features. ... Figure 1. An illustration of the task design, showing a series of displays learnt

4 Dec 2013: This is a computerized analogueof the Wisconsin Card Sort Test from the CANTAB battery. ... The statisticaltests were carried out using IBM SPSS 18.0 statistical software,and two-tailed tests were used throughout.

29 May 2013: Knowing that it is impossible to assessmeaningfully the experience of an animalthat can’t talk, Clayton and Dickinson(1998) developed a behavioural test basedon the original definitions of episodicmemory as involving

3 Sep 2007: condition. In order to test formally for whether the regions activated. ... for each participant. The resulting correlations were entered. into one-sample t-tests to test for consistent results across.

8 Jun 2015: To study both errors of omission and errors of commission,psychologists have often used a test–retest methodology. ... According to Fisher’s exact test, those who tookSurvey 1 only or Surveys 1 and 2 could not be considered as twogroups.

22 May 2006: These estimates were entered intothe second stage of analysis treating subjects as a random effect, using a one-sample t-test across subjects. ... To test this possibility, a second analysis wasconducted including RT as a parametric modulator to

12 Sep 2023: attention layer network (simple-3D-MHL) were used to train and test the prediction of the presence of the paracingulate sulcus. ... To train, validate and test our. explainable framework, we used a comprehensively annotated cohort of 596 subjects from

5 Feb 2013: Theseestimates were entered into the second stage of analysis treat-ing subjects as a random effect, using one-sample t-tests across. ... 1997), Dux and Marois (2009). Paired samplest-tests comparing T2 accuracy for fearful vs.

26 Apr 2004: AD, as indicated by a significant t test on information type for thisgroup, t(14) 4.31, MSE 0.065, p. ... a significant t test on informationtype for this group, t(20) 6.61, MSE 0.032, p.

28 Jan 2010: A sec-ond possible explanation for the divergence between neuroimag-ing and neuropsychological findings is that the tests used forneuropsychological assessment are relatively insensitive to theabilities supported by MPFC [see Burgess